Literature DB >> 16729979

Cognitive control of attention in the human brain: insights from orienting attention to mental representations.

Jöran Lepsien1, Anna C Nobre.   

Abstract

In this review, we summarize a new line of experimentation showing that attentional orienting can bias information processing in the working memory domain as well as in the perceptual domain to optimize goal-directed behavior. A new experimental paradigm was developed, which revealed that spatial orienting cues that appear after perceptual events (retro-cues), when these have been internalized into working memory representations, can retrospectively enhance performance to a similar degree as spatial precues appearing before perceptual events. As part of their facilitatory action, retro-cues diminish the costs of retrieving items from increasing loads within working memory. Hemodynamic and electrophysiological brain imaging experiments show a high degree of overlap between brain areas and dynamics involved in spatial orienting in the working memory domain compared to the perceptual domain. In addition, functional magnetic resonance imaging points to the selective involvement of frontal areas during spatial orienting in the working memory domain. The roles of different frontal areas remain to be clarified but may include both early roles in guiding spatial shifts occurring within a mnemonic context as well as selection of memorized targets amidst distracting stimuli. Experiments have also begun to reveal the ability to orient attention selectively to object-based representations in working memory and suggest that the neural representations of objects in working memory can be directly modulated by this process. The findings bolster contemporary notions of a strong theoretical relationship between attentional orienting and working memory, suggesting that these two cognitive functions interact in more ways and directions than previously considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16729979     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  47 in total

1.  The contribution of working memory to divided attention.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Attention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-20

3.  Goal-directed access to mental objects in working memory: the role of task-specific feature retrieval.

Authors:  Sabine Schwager; Herbert Hagendorf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

4.  Foraging for thought: an inhibition-of-return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Johnson; Julie A Higgins; Kenneth A Norman; Per B Sederberg; Troy A Smith; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-07

5.  Role of medial cortical networks for anticipatory processing in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Kristina T Ciesielski; Scott L Rauch; Seppo P Ahlfors; Mark E Vangel; Sabine Wilhelm; Bruce R Rosen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  The role of top-down suppression in mitigating the disruptive effects of task-irrelevant feature changes in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

7.  Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory.

Authors:  Tobias Katus; Matthias M Müller; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Differential engagement of brain regions within a 'core' network during scene construction.

Authors:  Jennifer J Summerfield; Demis Hassabis; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Common and distinct neural correlates of perceptual and memorial selection.

Authors:  Derek Evan Nee; John Jonides
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Applying an attentional set to perceived and remembered features.

Authors:  Duncan Edward Astle; Anna Christina Nobre; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.