Literature DB >> 16729261

High-resolution renal MRA: comparison of image quality and vessel depiction with different parallel imaging acceleration factors.

Henrik J Michaely1, Karin A Herrmann, Harald Kramer, Olaf Dietrich, Gerhard Laub, Maximilian F Reiser, Stefan O Schoenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the image quality and vessel depiction of renal MRA with integrated parallel imaging techniques (iPAT) using acceleration factors of 2 and 3.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study renal MRA was performed on 14 and 12 patients with acceleration factors of 3 and 2, respectively. For the MRA a 3D-GRE sequence with an acquired spatial resolution of 0.9 x 0.8 x 1.0 mm(3) was applied (TR/TE = 3.79 msec/1.39 msec, FOV = 400 mm x 320 mm, acquired matrix = 512 x 384, flip angle = 25 degrees) on a 32-channel 1.5T MR scanner. The acquisition time was 26 seconds with iPAT 2, and 19 seconds with iPAT3. All parameters other than acquisition time and acceleration factor were kept constant. To assess the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) we performed repetitive phantom measurements using iPAT 2 and 3. The images were rated by two radiologists in terms of noise, artifacts, and the quality of vessel depiction for the proximal, segmental, and subsegmental renal artery. A Mann-Whitney U-test and kappa-test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: SNR decreased significantly with iPAT 3 in the phantom measurements. The two readers found no difference in noise, but significantly fewer artifacts with iPAT 3. The depiction of segmental vessels was significantly better for both readers with iPAT 3, and the subsegmental vessels were rated significantly better by one reader. iPAT 3 also resulted in a better interreader agreement.
CONCLUSION: The use of iPAT 3 for renal MRA enables a better depiction of the distal parts of the renal artery. The decrease in SNR is not diagnostically impairing. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16729261     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  9 in total

Review 1.  MRA of abdominal vessels: technical advances.

Authors:  Henrik J Michaely; Olaf Dietrich; Kambiz Nael; Sabine Weckbach; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and GRAPPA-VIBE for liver MRI at 1.5 T: a comparative in vivo patient study.

Authors:  Ajaykumar C Morani; Rafael A Vicens; Wei Wei; Shiva Gupta; Raghu Vikram; Aparna Balachandran; Brandy J Reed; Jingfei Ma; Aliya Qayyum; Janio Szklaruk
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Assessment of the kidneys: magnetic resonance angiography, perfusion and diffusion.

Authors:  Ulrike I Attenberger; John N Morelli; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen with highly accelerated acquisition techniques.

Authors:  Petrice M Mostardi; James F Glockner; Phillip M Young; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  [Vascular and parenchymal diseases of the kidney].

Authors:  H J Michaely; M Reichert; S Weckbach; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  [Screening in cardiovascular diseases].

Authors:  H Kramer; S Weckbach; G van Kaick; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pulsatile abdominal mass, suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Benoit Desjardins; Karin E Dill; Scott D Flamm; Christopher J Francois; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Sanjeeva P Kalva; M Ashraf Mansour; Emile R Mohler; Isabel B Oliva; Matthew P Schenker; Clifford Weiss; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with high spatial resolution for evaluating intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Donghyun Kim; Young Jin Heo; Hae Woong Jeong; Jin Wook Baek; Gi Won Shin; Sung-Chul Jin; Hye Jin Baek; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Kang Soo Kim; InSeong Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-01-18

9.  Accelerated Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction for the Evaluation of Intracranial Arteries.

Authors:  Hehan Tang; Na Hu; Yuan Yuan; Chunchao Xia; Xiumin Liu; Panli Zuo; Aurelien F Stalder; Michaela Schmidt; Xiaoyue Zhou; Bin Song; Jiayu Sun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.500

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.