Literature DB >> 16727686

The frequency of endemic fetal loss in dairy cattle: a review.

A L Forar1, J M Gay, D D Hancock.   

Abstract

Estimates of the frequency of endemic fetal loss range from 0.4 to 10.6%, a 26-fold difference, in 26 studies of dairy herds over 5 decades. Sources of this difference include breed, geographic, study population, case definition and procedural differences. The definition of fetal loss was inconsistent among the studies and was often not clearly stated. Twelve of the studies cited only visually observed losses, while the remainder reported losses of all known pregnancies but using different gestational at-risk periods. Definitions of the resulting frequency measure and methods of computation varied widely among the studies. Fetal loss frequencies have been reported as ratios, proportions, incidence rates and cumulative incidence rates. Denominators used in frequency calculations have included the number of pregnant cows, number of cows in the breeding herd, number of cows that calved before or after the risk period and number of calves born. These procedural differences make comparisons among studies and an overall estimate of an expected frequency of endemic fetal loss in dairy cattle difficult at best. Procedural and definition differences aside, the median frequency of fetal loss from studies enumerating only observed abortions was 1.95% and from the studies that included both observed and unobserved abortions 6.5%. Based on this difference, approximately only 30% of endemic fetal losses are observed visually.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16727686     DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(95)00063-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

1.  Milk yield and reproductive performance of brucellosis-vaccinated but seropositive Holstein cows.

Authors:  Miguel Mellado; Angel M Garcia; Beatriz Arellano-Reynoso; Efren Diaz-Aparicio; Jose E Garcia
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Pregnancy loss in dairy cows: the contributing factors, the effects on reproductive performance and the economic impact.

Authors:  Je In Lee; Ill Hwa Kim
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.603

3.  The role of herpesviruses (BoHV-1 and BoHV-4) and pestiviruses (BVDV and BDV) in ruminant abortion cases in western Turkey.

Authors:  Pelin Tuncer-Göktuna; Gizem Alpay; Eda Baldan Öner; Kadir Yeşilbağ
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Why do farmers and veterinarians not report all bovine abortions, as requested by the clinical brucellosis surveillance system in France?

Authors:  Anne Bronner; Viviane Hénaux; Nicolas Fortané; Pascal Hendrikx; Didier Calavas
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Metabolomics and pathway analyses to characterize metabolic alterations in pregnant dairy cows on D 17 and D 45 after AI.

Authors:  Y S Guo; J Z Tao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sanitary program to reduce embryonic mortality associated with infectious diseases in cattle.

Authors:  Amauri Alcindo Alfieri; Raquel Arruda Leme; Alais Maria Dall Agnol; Alice Fernandes Alfieri
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 1.807

7.  Assessing the mandatory bovine abortion notification system in France using unilist capture-recapture approach.

Authors:  Anne Bronner; Viviane Hénaux; Timothée Vergne; Jean-Luc Vinard; Eric Morignat; Pascal Hendrikx; Didier Calavas; Emilie Gay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Seroprevalence of bluetongue virus in dairy herds with reproductive problems in Sudan.

Authors:  Amira Mohamed Elhassan; Mohamed Abdalla Fadol; Abdel Rahim Mohamed El Hussein
Journal:  ISRN Vet Sci       Date:  2014-03-19

9.  Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of bovine brucellosis surveillance in a disease-free country using stochastic scenario tree modelling.

Authors:  Viviane Hénaux; Didier Calavas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.