Literature DB >> 24254418

Milk yield and reproductive performance of brucellosis-vaccinated but seropositive Holstein cows.

Miguel Mellado1, Angel M Garcia, Beatriz Arellano-Reynoso, Efren Diaz-Aparicio, Jose E Garcia.   

Abstract

The aim of this research was to study if seropositivity for brucellosis in vaccinated cows against this disease hampers reproductive performance and milk production in high-yielding Holstein cows. For this purpose 1,026 healthy cows and 372 cows seropositive for brucellosis were enrolled in this study. Cows positive to card test and subsequently to the rivanol test were further subjected to the radial immunodiffusion (RID) test. It was found that only 11% of the presumably infected cows by brucellosis screening tests were really infected with this disease. The reproductive performance of the group of cows with 11% Brucella-infected animals was not impaired; overall pregnancy rate did not differ between seropositive and healthy cows (30.9 vs. 29.6%). The abortion rates were similar between seropositive cows (5.3%) and seronegative animals (6.9%). Cows in the herd with 11% Brucella-infected animals produced significantly more milk than unaffected cows over a 305-day lactation (10,684 ± 1,720 vs. 10,345 ± 1,736; mean ± SD; P < 0.05). It was concluded that in dairy herds vaccinated against brucellosis with both 19 and RB51 strains, supplemental tests such as RID need to be conducted on all reactors in order to maintain diagnostic accuracy. These results also indicate that 11% animal prevalence of brucellosis did not exert a detrimental effect on 305-day milk yield and reproductive performance in high milk-yielding Holstein cows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24254418     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-013-0502-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  28 in total

Review 1.  Adaptation of the Brucellae to their intracellular niche.

Authors:  R Martin Roop; Bryan H Bellaire; Michelle Wright Valderas; James A Cardelli
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Brucellosis in Argentina.

Authors:  Luis E Samartino
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 3.  Brucella evasion of adaptive immunity.

Authors:  Anna Martirosyan; Jean-Pierre Gorvel
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.165

4.  Radial immunodiffusion test with a Brucella polysaccharide antigen for differentiating infected from vaccinated cattle.

Authors:  R Diaz; P Garatea; L M Jones; I Moriyon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Persistence of Brucella abortus infection in six herds of cattle under brucellosis eradication.

Authors:  D O Cordes; M E Carter
Journal:  N Z Vet J       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.628

6.  Efficacy of strain RB51 vaccine in heifers against experimental brucellosis.

Authors:  Fernando P Poester; Vítor S P Gonçalves; Tatiane A Paixão; Renato L Santos; Steven C Olsen; Gerhardt G Schurig; Andrey P Lage
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 7.  Brucellosis: a worldwide zoonosis.

Authors:  M L Boschiroli; V Foulongne; D O'Callaghan
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Genetic parameters for anovulation and pregnancy loss in dairy cattle.

Authors:  R L Bamber; G E Shook; M C Wiltbank; J E P Santos; P M Fricke
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Pathological, immunohistochemical and bacteriological study of tissues and milk of cows and fetuses experimentally infected with Brucella abortus.

Authors:  M N Xavier; T A Paixão; F P Poester; A P Lage; R L Santos
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 1.311

10.  Effects of heat stress on energetic metabolism in lactating Holstein cows.

Authors:  J B Wheelock; R P Rhoads; M J Vanbaale; S R Sanders; L H Baumgard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  3 in total

1.  Brucella species circulating in rural and periurban dairy cattle farms: a comparative study in an endemic area.

Authors:  Saeed Alamian; Karim Amiry; Akram Bahreinipour; Afshar Etemadi; Majid Tebianian; Mohammad Hossein Fallah Mehrabadi; Maryam Dadar
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis and the brucellosis model at the individual level of dairy cattle in the West Bandung District, Indonesia.

Authors:  Yuli Yanti; Bambang Sumiarto; Tri Anggraeni Kusumastuti; Aprizal Panus; Sodirun Sodirun
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-01-05

Review 3.  Importance of brucellosis control programs of livestock on the improvement of one health.

Authors:  Maryam Dadar; Ruchi Tiwari; Khan Sharun; Kuldeep Dhama
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.320

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.