Literature DB >> 16727283

Relationship of parity and body condition score to pregnancy rates in Florida beef cattle.

D O Rae1, W E Kunkle, P J Chenoweth, R S Sand, T Tran.   

Abstract

Pregnancy rates, determined by per rectum palpation, were analyzed with respect to cow parity (range 1 to >8 calvings) and body condition score (BCS, 1=thin to 9=fat) at pregnancy examination for 3734 beef cattle females on 3 commercial beef operations (8 herds) in 3 Florida counties in 1989 and 1990. The means and standard deviations for the herds were the following: pregnancy rate, 81.3 +/- 39% (range 62.1 to 91.5%); BCS, 4.7 +/- 0.6 (range 4.3 to 4.9); and parity, 3.9 +/- 2.3 (range 2.8 to 4.8). Significant associations were found between pregnancy rate, parity, BCS and herd (P < 0.001); and between the variable interactions, parity with BCS, herd with BCS, and herd with parity (P < 0.001). Cows with a BCS </=4 had a pregnancy rate of 59%; those with a BCS >/=5 had a pregnancy rate of 90%. Cows having a parity of <4 had a PR of 80%, while cows having a parity >/=4 had a PR of 85%. The interaction of parity with BCS was significant, resulting in pregnancy rates as follows; parity <4 and BCS </= 4 was 51%; parity < 4 and BCS >/= 5 was 88%; parity >/=4 and BCS </= 4 was 66%; and parity >/=5 and BCS >/= 5 was 93%. Body condition, parity, and the interaction of body condition and parity play important roles in the reproductive performance of commercial beef cows in Florida.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 16727283     DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(93)90013-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Transcriptome profiles in peripheral white blood cells at the time of artificial insemination discriminate beef heifers with different fertility potential.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickinson; Brock A Griffin; Michelle F Elmore; Lisa Kriese-Anderson; Joshua B Elmore; Paul W Dyce; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Evaluation of age, weaning weight, body condition score, and reproductive tract score in pre-selected beef heifers relative to reproductive potential.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickinson; Michelle F Elmore; Lisa Kriese-Anderson; Joshua B Elmore; Bailey N Walker; Paul W Dyce; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-26

3.  Rewiring of gene expression in circulating white blood cells is associated with pregnancy outcome in heifers (Bos taurus).

Authors:  Sarah E Moorey; Bailey N Walker; Michelle F Elmore; Joshua B Elmore; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effects of management system on beef heifer growth and reproductive performance.

Authors:  Parker A Henley; Frank A Ireland; Igor F Canisso; J Lannett Edwards; Daniel W Shike
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-18

5.  Eco-epidemiology of porcine trypanosomosis in Karim Lamido, Nigeria: prevalence, seasonal distribution, tsetse density and infection rates.

Authors:  Solomon Ngutor Karshima; Ikwe Ajogi; Garba Mohammed
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.876

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.