Literature DB >> 16725325

Biomechanical analysis of stair ambulation in lower limb amputees.

Thomas Schmalz1, Siegmar Blumentritt, Björn Marx.   

Abstract

Lower extremity amputees have to cope with many activities in everyday life that are substantially more difficult than walking on level ground, and such demands require a high degree of functionality from their prosthetic components. The present study is a biomechanical evaluation (kinematics, kinetics and EMG) of stair ascent and descent in a group of eight transtibial amputees (mean (standard deviation): age 51(14) years, height 176(7)cm, mass 88(19)kg); a group of 12 transfemoral amputees (age 37(8) years, height 182(7)cm, mass 83(7)kg) fitted with the electronically controlled C-LEG knee joint system; and a group of 12 able bodied persons (age 30(10) years, height 174(12)cm, mass 69(12)kg). During stair descent the transfemoral amputees presented a strong reduction of the prosthetic ankle moments (0.11Nm/kg) compared to transtibial amputees (0.93Nm/kg) and control subjects (1.26Nm/kg). Loading of the prosthetic knee joint in the transfemoral amputees more closely resembles the loading seen in the control population when compared to transtibial amputees (mean maximum flexion moment: controls 1.31Nm/kg, transfemoral amputees 1.00Nm/kg, transtibial amputees 0.50Nm/kg). Overload of the contralateral limb is more prominent in the transfemoral amputee than in the transtibial amputee. During stair ascent, the transtibial amputee presents a significant reduction of the knee flexion moment compared to the controls (mean maximum flexion moment: transtibial amputees 0.28Nm/kg, controls 1.31Nm/kg). These differences correlate with a change in the muscle activity of the knee extensor and hamstring muscles. The results also show adaptations in motor strategies during stair negotiation, for those with the partial loss of a lower limb due to the functional limits of current prosthetic components. The present data may contribute to a further enhancement of the efficiency of prosthetic feet and knee joints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16725325     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  12 in total

1.  [Function of prosthesis components in lower limb amputees with bone-anchored percutaneous implants : Biomechanical aspects].

Authors:  S Blumentritt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF THE CONTINUOUS SCALE-PHYSICAL FUNCTIONAL PEFORMANCE-10 (CS-PFP-10) TEST IN TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTEES.

Authors:  M Jason Highsmith; Jason T Kahle; Rebecca M Miro; M Elaine Cress; William S Quillen; Stephanie L Carey; Rajiv V Dubey; Larry J Mengelkoch
Journal:  Technol Innov       Date:  2016-09-01

3.  Gait characteristics of individuals with transtibial amputations walking on a destabilizing rock surface.

Authors:  Deanna H Gates; Jonathan B Dingwell; Shawn J Scott; Emily H Sinitski; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Trunk kinetic effort during step ascent and descent in patients with transtibial amputation using angular momentum separation.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Does a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee affect stair ascent strategies in persons with transfemoral amputation?

Authors:  Jennifer M Aldridge Whitehead; Erik J Wolf; Charles R Scoville; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biomechanical compensations of the trunk and lower extremities during stepping tasks after unilateral transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Amanda M Murray; Brecca M Gaffney; Bradley S Davidson; Cory L Christiansen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Trunk movement compensations and corresponding core muscle demand during step ambulation in people with unilateral transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  The effect of segmental weight of prosthesis on hemodynamic responses and energy expenditure of lower extremity amputees.

Authors:  Akmer Mutlu; Mohammad Dawood Kharooty; Yavuz Yakut
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-04-20

10.  Standing on slopes - how current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support transtibial and transfemoral amputees in an everyday task.

Authors:  Michael Ernst; Björn Altenburg; Malte Bellmann; Thomas Schmalz
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.