Literature DB >> 16724897

Endoscopic lithotripsy and the FREDDY laser: initial experience.

Francis Dubosq1, Federico Pasqui, Frédéric Girard, Sébastien Beley, Nicolas Lesaux, Bernard Gattegno, Philippe Thibault, Olivier Traxer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The frequency-doubled double-pulse neodymium:YAG (FREDDY) laser has been developed for endoscopic lithotripsy and combines the characteristics of solid and dye lasers with a thin flexible optical fiber enabling it to be used with flexible ureterorenoscopy. Furthermore, it is less expensive and easier to maintain than other lasers. Our goal was to evaluate its efficacy and role in the ureteroscopic treatment of urinary stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a FREDDY laser in 26 patients (29 stones). For 4 stone cases, this was the first line of treatment; for the remaining cases, this was the second line of treatment, following SWL in 23 cases and nephrolithotomy in 2 cases. The mean stone size was 9 mm, with a range of 6 to 15 mm. There were 13 renal and 16 ureteral stones. The absence of residual fragments at 3-month postoperative radiography was considered to reflect successful treatment.
RESULTS: Twenty-six stones were treated with satisfactory results. Within 3 months, 18 patients were stone free (69%), and 72.4% of the stones (21/29) had been treated completely. Fragments of 8 stones still remained in 8 patients. Of these stones, 5 were >10 mm and persisted at 3 months. Fragmentation was ineffective for 2 cystine stones and poor for 1 calcium oxalate monohydrate stone. Hospitalization, on average, was 1.5 days with a range of 1 to 3 days. A ureteral perforation was observed in the case of an impacted ureteral stone.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the wavelengths used, endoscopic FREDDY laser lithotripsy is an effective and harmless method. This laser can be used as a therapeutic tool because of its moderate cost and ability to be used with flexible ureterorenoscopy. However, it is important to be aware of the FREDDY laser's limited fragmentation capabilities for cystine stones and its inability to treat tissue lesions such as urinary-tract stenosis and tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16724897     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

1.  In vitro investigations of repulsion during laser lithotripsy using a pendulum set-up.

Authors:  Ronald Sroka; Nicolas Haseke; Thomas Pongratz; Volkmar Hecht; Derya Tilki; Christian G Stief; Markus Jürgen Bader
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  The evolution of lasers in urology.

Authors:  Amir Zarrabi; Andreas J Gross
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 3.  Ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy: technologic advancements.

Authors:  B Alexander; A I Fishman; M Grasso
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser for mini-percutaneous treatment of upper urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hongbo Luo; Xiuheng Liu; Shengqi Lv
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2007-04

Review 5.  Lasers in clinical urology: state of the art and new horizons.

Authors:  Andrew J Marks; Joel M H Teichman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Analysis of long-term effect of ureteral balloon dilatation combined with internal and external drainage tube in the treatment of benign ureteral stricture.

Authors:  Haohao Lu; Chuansheng Zheng; Bin Liang; Bin Xiong
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using Swiss Lithoclast for treatment of ureteral calculi: 12-years experience.

Authors:  Young Kwon Hong; Dong Soo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.