Literature DB >> 16723328

A macro-ergonomic work system analysis of the diagnostic testing process in an outpatient health care facility for process improvement and patient safety.

M L Hallock1, S J Alper, B Karsh.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of illness is important for quality patient care and patient safety and is greatly aided by diagnostic testing. For diagnostic tests, such as pathology and radiology, to positively impact patient care, the tests must be processed and the physician and patient must be notified of the results in a timely fashion. There are many steps in the diagnostic testing process, from ordering to result dissemination, where the process can break down and therefore delay patient care and reduce patient safety. This study was carried out to examine the diagnostic testing process (i.e. from ordering to result notification) and used a macro-ergonomic work system analysis to uncover system design flaws that contributed to delayed physician and patient notification of results. The study was carried out in a large urban outpatient health-care facility made up of 30 outpatient clinics. Results indicated a number of variances that contributed to delays, the majority of which occurred across the boundaries of different systems and were related to poor or absent feedback structures. Recommendations for improvements are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16723328     DOI: 10.1080/00140130600568832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

Review 1.  Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Laurie L Novak; Kevin B Johnson; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Value of human factors to medication and patient safety in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Matthew C Scanlon; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Continuing Patient Care during Electronic Health Record Downtime.

Authors:  Ethan Larsen; Daniel Hoffman; Carlos Rivera; Brian M Kleiner; Christian Wernz; Raj M Ratwani
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.

Authors:  Nicole E Werner; Rachel Rutkowski; Amy Graske; Mary K Finta; Craig R Sellers; Sandhya Seshadri; Manish N Shah
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Work systems analysis of sterile processing: assembly.

Authors:  Myrtede Alfred; Ken Catchpole; Emily Huffer; Larry Fredendall; Kevin M Taaffe
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Patient source of learning about health technologies and ratings of trust in technologies used in their care.

Authors:  Enid Montague
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Work systems analysis of sterile processing: decontamination.

Authors:  Myrtede Alfred; Ken Catchpole; Emily Huffer; Larry Fredendall; Kevin M Taaffe
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  SEIPS-based process modeling in primary care.

Authors:  Abigail R Wooldridge; Pascale Carayon; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Peter L T Hoonakker
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Describing and modeling workflow and information flow in chronic disease care.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Matthew B Weinger; Kevin B Johnson; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Macroergonomics in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ayse P Gurses; Richard Holden; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Enid Montague; Joy Rodriguez; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-09-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.