| Literature DB >> 16722535 |
Samia Mazahir1, Rabia Malik, Maria Maqsood, Kanwal Aliraza Merchant, Farida Malik, Atif Majeed, Zafar Fatmi, Muhammad Rizwanulhaq Khawaja, Shehzad Ghaffar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancers are a major cancer burden in Pakistan. They share a common risk factor profile including regular consumption of products of betel, areca and tobacco. Use of paan, chaalia, gutka, niswar and tumbaku is acceptable in Pakistan and is considered a normal cultural practice. This cross-sectional study was carried out to understand the relation of socio-demographic factors for the consumption of paan, chaalia, gutka, niswar and tumbaku in Pakistani population. Through systematic sampling, 425 subjects from a squatter settlement in Karachi were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. High risk behavior was defined as Daily use of any of the above products.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16722535 PMCID: PMC1475829 DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ISSN: 1747-597X
Distribution of the gender, age groups, marital status and ethnicities in a Pakistani squatter settlement*
| Number (N) | Gender | Age Group | Marital Status | ||||
| Male | Female | Adolescents | Adults | Non-Married | Married | ||
| Punjabi | 167 | 65 | 102 | 36 | 127 | 61 | 105 |
| Pathan | 113 | 60 | 52 | 31 | 81 | 50 | 63 |
| Sindhi | 67 | 39 | 28 | 18 | 47 | 31 | 36 |
| Mohajir | 40 | 29 | 11 | 5 | 35 | 14 | 26 |
| Others | 38 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
* Less number of subjects in groups are due to missing data
Male gender as predictor of daily use of betel, areca and smokeless tobacco products in a Pakistani squatter settlement
| Prevalence (%) | Univariate OR [95% CI] | ||
| Males | Females | ||
| Paan | 12.4 | 1.0 | 13.56 [3.16–58.22] |
| Chaalia | 19.7 | 22.3 | 0.85 [0.52–1.40] |
| Gutka | 13.5 | 0.5 | 29.69 [4.01–219.70] |
| Niswar | 25.4 | 5.2 | 6.22 [3.05–12.70] |
| Tumbaku | 13.5 | 1.0 | 14.86 [3.48–63.56] |
| Overall | 50.3 | 28.5 | 2.53 [1.66–3.86] |
Adolescent age group as predictor of daily use of betel, areca and smokeless tobacco products in a Pakistani squatter settlement
| Prevalence (%) | Univariate OR [95% CI] | ||
| Adolescents | Adults | ||
| Paan | 5.9 | 7.2 | 0.81 [0.31–2.07] |
| Chaalia | 40.2 | 14.4 | 4.00 [2.38–6.72] |
| Gutka | 9.8 | 6.1 | 1.67 [0.74–3.77] |
| Niswar | 3.9 | 19.4 | 0.17 [0.06–0.48] |
| Tumbaku | 4.9 | 8.3 | 0.57 [0.21–1.55] |
| Overall | 45.1 | 37.8 | 1.35 [0.85–2.14] |
Marital status as predictor of daily use of betel, areca and smokeless tobacco products in a Pakistani squatter settlement
| Prevalence (%) | Univariate OR [95% CI] | ||
| Non-Married | Married | ||
| Paan | 9.0 | 5.2 | 1.79 [0.81–3.98] |
| Chaalia | 32.1 | 13.9 | 2.92 [1.77–4.82] |
| Gutka | 12.8 | 3.0 | 4.68 [1.93–11.37] |
| Niswar | 12.8 | 17.0 | 0.72 [0.40–1.29] |
| Tumbaku | 7.7 | 7.0 | 1.11 [0.51–2.43] |
| Overall | 48.7 | 33.5 | 1.88 [1.24–2.86] |
Ethnicity as predictor of daily use of betel, areca and smokeless tobacco products in a Pakistani squatter settlement
| Prevalence (%) | Univariate OR [95% CI] | Mean | |
| Paan | |||
| Sindhi | 6.0% | 0.25 [0.07–0.91] | 8.7 |
| Punjabi | 7.2% | 0.31 [0.12–0.82] | 6.5 |
| Pathan | 1.8% | 0.07 [0.01–0.36] | 11.0 |
| Mohajir | 20.2% | 1.00 | 8.0 |
| Chaalia | |||
| Sindhi | 25.4% | NS | 4.8 |
| Punjabi | 17.4% | NS | 6.7 |
| Pathan | 21.2% | NS | 8.9 |
| Mohajir | 30.0% | 1.00 | 5.9 |
| Gutka | |||
| Sindhi | 6.0% | NS | 5.0 |
| Punjabi | 6.6% | 0.33 [0.12–0.92] | 10.7 |
| Pathan | 4.4% | 0.22 [0.06–0.73] | 5.4 |
| Mohajir | 17.5% | 1.00 | 7.4 |
| Niswar | |||
| Sindhi | 6.0% | 1.00 | 24.0 |
| Punjabi | 12.6% | NS | 11.6 |
| Pathan | 24.8% | 5.18 [1.73–15.53] | 16.7 |
| Mohajir | 15.0% | NS | 14.2 |
| Tumbaku | |||
| Sindhi | 3.0% | 0.12 [0.02–0.61] | 4.5 |
| Punjabi | 7.8% | 0.34 [0.13–0.88] | 10.5 |
| Pathan | 4.4% | 0.18 [0.06–0.61] | 11.8 |
| Mohajir | 20.0% | 1.00 | 8.1 |
| Overall | |||
| Sindhi | 34.3% | NS | 10.5 |
| Punjabi | 34.7% | NS | 13.4 |
| Pathan | 46.0% | NS | 15.2 |
| Mohajir | 50.0% | 1.00 | 16.8 |
NS = Difference not statistically significant