Literature DB >> 16721622

Task set determines the amount of crowding.

Anke Huckauf1.   

Abstract

The present study deals with the question of how crowding effects, which are interactions among adjacent features or characters, emerges automatically or by so-called higher level controlled processing. Two experiments are presented comparing performances during detecting, localizing, and identifying a flanked target in same strings when the target was defined on the basis of either its form or its category. Detection and localization performances were better for form- relative to category-defined targets whereas the reverse was observed for identification performance. This shows that the interacting information is indeed high level in that it is affected by task settings like the defining target feature and the observers' task set. The results suggest that crowding effects do not emerge due to processes depending on the parameters of stimulus presentation, but due to processes activated by certain task sets.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16721622     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0054-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  20 in total

1.  Lateral masking: limitations of the feature interaction account.

Authors:  A Huckauf; D Heller; T A Nazir
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-01

2.  Spatial selection in peripheral letter recognition: in search of boundary conditions.

Authors:  Anke Huckauf; Dieter Heller
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-07

3.  On the relations between crowding and visual masking.

Authors:  Anke Huckauf; Dieter Heller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

4.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Melanie Palomares; Najib J Majaj
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: font-specific, schematic tuning.

Authors:  T Sanocki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Selection in visual immediate memory.

Authors:  J M Von Wright
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  4 in total

1.  Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?

Authors:  Anke Huckauf; Andre Knops; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Klaus Willmes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

2.  Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Bilge Sayim; Vitaly Chicherov; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Broad attention uncovers benefits of stimulus uniformity in visual crowding.

Authors:  Koen Rummens; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.

Authors:  David Whitney; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.229

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.