Literature DB >> 10070209

Lateral masking: limitations of the feature interaction account.

A Huckauf1, D Heller, T A Nazir.   

Abstract

Recognition performance for a target letter embedded in a string of characters is worse than that for targets presented in isolation. This lateral masking (LM) effect is known to depend on target eccentricity and spacing between target and flankers (Bouma, 1970), indicating that LM arises in early visual processing due to interactions among visual features. The feature interaction account would predict that flankers consisting of similar features produce similar LM effects and that differences in LM produced by different types of flanker diminish with increasing target eccentricity and decreasing spacing. However, in a series of six experiments, this prediction was shown not to be true. Flankers that did not access a higher level code (e.g., pseudoletters or rotated letters) produced more LM than standard letter flankers. Moreover, effects of different flanker types were most pronounced for medium target eccentricities and medium spacings for which recognition performance scores ranged between 40% and 60%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10070209     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  12 in total

1.  How important is lateral masking in visual search?

Authors:  A H Wertheim; I T C Hooge; K Krikke; A Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Task set determines the amount of crowding.

Authors:  Anke Huckauf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-23

3.  Explorations in the language of perception and the perception of language.

Authors:  Ralph Radach; Arthur M Jacobs; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11

4.  Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?

Authors:  Anke Huckauf; Andre Knops; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Klaus Willmes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

5.  Broad attention uncovers benefits of stimulus uniformity in visual crowding.

Authors:  Koen Rummens; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Saccadic selection and crowding in visual search: stronger lateral masking leads to shorter search times.

Authors:  Jelmer P de Vries; Ignace T C Hooge; Marco A Wiering; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding.

Authors:  Kristin Williamson; Miranda Scolari; Sukeun Jeong; Min-Shik Kim; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system.

Authors:  Marina V Danilova; Valeria M Bondarko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition - no inversion effects in three-digit number magnitude processing in adults.

Authors:  Julia Bahnmueller; Korbinian Moeller; Anne Mann; Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-12

10.  Response selection modulates crowding: a cautionary tale for invoking top-down explanations.

Authors:  Josephine Reuther; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.