Literature DB >> 16721568

Imaging biomarkers as surrogate endpoints for drug development.

Wolf S Richter1.   

Abstract

The employment of biomarkers (including imaging biomarkers, especially PET) in drug development has gained increasing attention during recent years. This has been partly stimulated by the hope that the integration of biomarkers into drug development programmes may be a means to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the drug development process by early identification of promising drug candidates--thereby counteracting the rising costs of drug development. More importantly, however, the interest in biomarkers for drug development is the logical consequence of recent advances in biosciences and medicine which are leading to target-specific treatments in the framework of "personalized medicine". A considerable proportion of target-specific drugs will show effects in subgroups of patients only. Biomarkers are a means to identify potential responders, or patient subgroups at risk for specific side-effects. Biomarkers are used in early drug development in the context of translational medicine to gain information about the drug's potential in different patient groups and disease states. The information obtained at this stage is mainly important for designing subsequent clinical trials and to identify promising drug candidates. Biomarkers in later phases of clinical development may--if properly validated--serve as surrogate endpoints for clinical outcomes. Regulatory agencies in the EU and the USA have facilitated the use of biomarkers early in the development process. The validation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints is part of FDA's "critical path initiative".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16721568     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0129-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  13 in total

Review 1.  Use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development and regulatory decision making: criteria, validation, strategies.

Authors:  L J Lesko; A J Atkinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 2.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Biomarkers in imaging: realizing radiology's future.

Authors:  John J Smith; A Gregory Sorensen; James H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Ronald W Hansen; Henry G Grabowski
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Medicine. What are the right targets for psychopharmacology?

Authors:  Steven E Hyman; Wayne S Fenton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Opinion: anticipating change in drug development: the emerging era of translational medicine and therapeutics.

Authors:  Garret A Fitzgerald
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs.

Authors:  John R Johnson; Grant Williams; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Androgen-independent prostate cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases: lessons from a rapid autopsy program.

Authors:  Rajal B Shah; Rohit Mehra; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Ronglai Shen; Debashis Ghosh; Ming Zhou; Gary R Macvicar; Soorynarayana Varambally; Jason Harwood; Tarek A Bismar; Robert Kim; Mark A Rubin; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Reporting results of cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Miller; B Hoogstraten; M Staquet; A Winkler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Imaging biomarkers: from research to patient care--a shift in view.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Biomarkers for osteoarthritis: current position and steps towards further validation.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Michael Nevitt; Elena Losina; Virginia Kraus
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 3.  A pathway and approach to biomarker validation and qualification for osteoarthritis clinical trials.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Elena Losina; Ali Guermazi; Deb Burstein; Marissa N Lassere; Virginia Kraus
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.465

4.  Validation of novel imaging methodologies for use as cancer clinical trial end-points.

Authors:  D J Sargent; L Rubinstein; L Schwartz; J E Dancey; C Gatsonis; L E Dodd; L K Shankar
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of the technical performance of an imaging procedure: guidelines and statistical methodology.

Authors:  Erich P Huang; Xiao-Feng Wang; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Lisa M McShane; Mithat Gönen; Jingjing Ye; Andrew J Buckler; Paul E Kinahan; Anthony P Reeves; Edward F Jackson; Alexander R Guimaraes; Gudrun Zahlmann
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  White paper on imaging biomarkers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-05-27

7.  ESR statement on the stepwise development of imaging biomarkers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-02-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.