Literature DB >> 11264461

Use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development and regulatory decision making: criteria, validation, strategies.

L J Lesko1, A J Atkinson.   

Abstract

In the future, biomarkers will play an increasingly important role in all phases of drug development, including regulatory review. However, only a few of these biomarkers will become established well enough to serve in regulatory decision making as surrogate endpoints, thereby substituting for traditional clinical endpoints. Even generally accepted surrogate endpoints are unlikely to capture all the therapeutic benefits and potential adverse effects a drug will have in a diverse patient population. Accordingly, combinations of biomarkers probably will be needed to provide a more complete characterization of the spectrum of pharmacologic response. In the future, pharmacogenomic approaches, including those based on differential expression of gene arrays, will provide panels of relevant biomarkers that can be expected to transform the drug development process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11264461     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 0362-1642            Impact factor:   13.820


  106 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging in psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Joseph C Masdeu
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Is blood pressure reduction a valid surrogate endpoint for stroke prevention? An analysis incorporating a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, a by-trial weighted errors-in-variables regression, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) and the Biomarker-Surrogacy (BioSurrogate) Evaluation Schema (BSES).

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere; Kent R Johnson; Michal Schiff; David Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  Biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Gabor G Illei; Peter E Lipsky
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Accelerating drug discovery.

Authors:  Sandra Kraljevic; Peter J Stambrook; Kresimir Pavelic
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Future prospects for biomarkers of alcohol consumption and alcohol-induced disorders.

Authors:  Willard M Freeman; Kent E Vrana
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Intranasal delivery--modification of drug metabolism and brain disposition.

Authors:  Yin Cheong Wong; Zhong Zuo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  An information-theoretic approach to surrogate-marker evaluation with failure time endpoints.

Authors:  Assam Pryseley; Abel Tilahun; Ariel Alonso; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 8.  Widening the path and window of opportunity for FDA approval of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant specific antidotes and reversal agents.

Authors:  Sunny Patel; Dylan Steen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Time-resolved CT assessment of collaterals as imaging biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tong; Jim Patrie; Sara Tong; Avery Evans; Patrik Michel; Ashraf Eskandari; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Why do so many drugs for Alzheimer's disease fail in development? Time for new methods and new practices?

Authors:  Robert E Becker; Nigel H Greig; Ezio Giacobini
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.