Literature DB >> 16721468

Effectiveness and efficiency of chemomechanical carious dentin removal.

Cláudia Silami de Magalhães1, Allyson Nogueira Moreira, Wagner Reis da Costa Campos, Fernanda Magalhães Rossi, Guilherme Augusto Alcaraz Castilho, Raquel Conceição Ferreira.   

Abstract

The aims of this in vitro study were both to determine the time necessary for removal of carious dentin (efficiency) and the Knoop Hardness Number (KHN) of the remaining dentin (effectiveness), using a chemomechanical method (Carisolv) or hand excavation. Thirty human molars were bisected through occlusal carious lesions into two equal halves. Each half was randomly excavated by hand in circular movements with a spoon excavator or using Carisolv gel according to the manufacturer's instructions. The duration of carious dentin removal was recorded. Tooth sections were resin-embedded, ground flat and polished. Dentin KHN was determined at distances of 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 microm from the cavity floor. Data were analyzed by Wilcoxon's test (alpha= 0.01), ANOVA and Student's t test (alpha= 0.05). The median of the time necessary for chemomechanical excavation was significantly greater than for hand excavation. KHN means (+/- SD) at 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 microm for chemomechanical method were, respectively: 15.6 (+/- 4.96), 18.0 (+/- 6.22), 21.3 (+/- 9.30), 24.3 (+/- 9.25), 28.5 (+/- 11.80); and for hand excavation were: 21.2 (+/- 10.26), 23.4 (+/- 9.49), 28.2 (+/- 11.62), 31.0 (+/- 12.17), 34.3 (+/- 11.95). It may be concluded that hand excavation presented higher efficiency and effectiveness than chemomechanical excavation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16721468     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402006000100014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of Marginal Leakage and Shear Bond Strength of Bonded Restorations in Primary Teeth after Caries Removal by Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques.

Authors:  Viral Pravin Maru; Bethur Siddaiah Shakuntala; Nagarathna Dharma
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-08-07

2.  Caries Removal by Chemomechanical (Carisolv™) vs. Rotary Drill: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Viral P Maru; B S Shakuntala; C Nagarathna
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  Microindentation hardness and calcium/phosphorus ratio of dentin following excavation of dental caries lesions with different techniques.

Authors:  Gunseli Katirci; R Banu Ermis
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 4.  Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group.

Authors:  Jo E Frencken; Mathilde C Peters; David J Manton; Soraya C Leal; Valeria V Gordan; Ece Eden
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Ankush Ramnarayan Boob; M Manjula; E Rajendra Reddy; N Srilaxmi; Tabitha Rani
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2014-04-26

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Chemo-mechanical and Rotary-mechanical Methods in Removal of Caries with Respect to Time Consumption and Pain Perception in Pediatrc Dental Patients.

Authors:  Ashish Katiyar; Sukriti Gupta; Kirtija Gupta; Karuna Sharma; Bhoomika Tripathi; Nitin Sharma
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.