Literature DB >> 16719586

Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and 2-year-old children (Homo sapiens) understand double invisible displacement?

Emma Collier-Baker1, Thomas Suddendorf.   

Abstract

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and young children (Homo sapiens) have difficulty with double invisible displacements in which an object is hidden in two nonadjacent boxes in a linear array. Experiment 1 eliminated the possibility that chimpanzees' previous poor performance was due to the hiding direction of the displacement device. As in Call (2001), subjects failed double nonadjacent displacements, showing a tendency to select adjacent boxes. In Experiments 2 and 3, chimpanzees and 24-month-old children were tested on a new adaptation of the task in which four hiding boxes were presented in a diamond-shaped array on a vertical plane. Both species performed above chance on double invisible displacements using this format, suggesting that previous poor performance was due to a response bias or inhibition problem rather than a fundamental limitation in representational capacity. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16719586     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.2.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  8 in total

1.  Cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds’ speech-sound discrimination: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Double invisible displacement understanding in orangutans: testing in non-locomotor and locomotor space.

Authors:  Suma Mallavarapu; Tara S Stoinski; Bonnie M Perdue; Terry L Maple
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  The evolution of primate visual self-recognition: evidence of absence in lesser apes.

Authors:  Thomas Suddendorf; Emma Collier-Baker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Where's the cookie? The ability of monkeys to track object transpositions.

Authors:  Katarzyna Majecka; Dariusz Pietraszewski
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Kea (Nestor notabilis) represent object trajectory and identity.

Authors:  Amalia P M Bastos; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Socio-spatial cognition in cats: Mentally mapping owner's location from voice.

Authors:  Saho Takagi; Hitomi Chijiiwa; Minori Arahori; Atsuko Saito; Kazuo Fujita; Hika Kuroshima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparing dogs and great apes in their ability to visually track object transpositions.

Authors:  Eveline F Rooijakkers; Juliane Kaminski; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Macphail's Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition.

Authors:  Amalia P M Bastos; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.