AIM: The observation of bright liver echo pattern on ultrasound is commonly considered a sign of hepatic steatosis. However, the interference of liver fibrosis on sensitivity and specificity of bright liver echo pattern has caused many to question its effectiveness as a diagnostic tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of bright liver echo pattern for liver steatosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 235 consecutive patients suspected of having liver disease of various aetiologies. Median age was 52 years (range, 17-72 years), and there was a male/female ratio of 1:18. All patients underwent ultrasound examination before liver biopsy and was performed by two operators. The presence or absence of bright liver echo pattern and posterior attenuation or areas with different patterns of fat infiltration were noted. Histologic evaluation was performed and graded by Ishak score. Steatosis was categorised as absent, 0-2%, 3-29% to 30-49% or >50%. RESULTS: Interobserver concordance was high. Bright liver echo pattern was found in 67% of patients with steatosis of any degree and 89% of patients with steatosis of >or=30%. Only three patients without steatosis, who had a low Ishak score, demonstrated bright liver echo pattern on ultrasonography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of bright liver echo pattern for steatosis were 64%, 97%, 96.0% and 65%, respectively. Among the subgroup of patients who had steatosis of >or=30%, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of bright liver echo pattern were 91%, 93%, 89% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of posterior attenuation and/or skip areas associated with bright liver echo pattern for steatosis were 89.7%, 100%, 100% and 92.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed bright liver echo pattern to be associated only with steatosis and not with fibrosis. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the presence of bright liver echo pattern is a sign of liver steatosis and that liver fibrosis does not interfere with ultrasound measurements. Posterior attenuation and/or skip areas are closely related to steatosis of >or=30%.
AIM: The observation of bright liver echo pattern on ultrasound is commonly considered a sign of hepatic steatosis. However, the interference of liver fibrosis on sensitivity and specificity of bright liver echo pattern has caused many to question its effectiveness as a diagnostic tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of bright liver echo pattern for liver steatosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 235 consecutive patients suspected of having liver disease of various aetiologies. Median age was 52 years (range, 17-72 years), and there was a male/female ratio of 1:18. All patients underwent ultrasound examination before liver biopsy and was performed by two operators. The presence or absence of bright liver echo pattern and posterior attenuation or areas with different patterns of fat infiltration were noted. Histologic evaluation was performed and graded by Ishak score. Steatosis was categorised as absent, 0-2%, 3-29% to 30-49% or >50%. RESULTS: Interobserver concordance was high. Bright liver echo pattern was found in 67% of patients with steatosis of any degree and 89% of patients with steatosis of >or=30%. Only three patients without steatosis, who had a low Ishak score, demonstrated bright liver echo pattern on ultrasonography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of bright liver echo pattern for steatosis were 64%, 97%, 96.0% and 65%, respectively. Among the subgroup of patients who had steatosis of >or=30%, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of bright liver echo pattern were 91%, 93%, 89% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of posterior attenuation and/or skip areas associated with bright liver echo pattern for steatosis were 89.7%, 100%, 100% and 92.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed bright liver echo pattern to be associated only with steatosis and not with fibrosis. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the presence of bright liver echo pattern is a sign of liver steatosis and that liver fibrosis does not interfere with ultrasound measurements. Posterior attenuation and/or skip areas are closely related to steatosis of >or=30%.
Authors: Manar N Amin; Muhammad A Rushdi; Raghda N Marzaban; Ayman Yosry; Kang Kim; Ahmed M Mahmoud Journal: Biomed Signal Process Control Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 3.880
Authors: Yingzhen N Zhang; Kathryn J Fowler; Gavin Hamilton; Jennifer Y Cui; Ethan Z Sy; Michelle Balanay; Jonathan C Hooker; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Alexander W Keedy; Richard S Breiman; Emily M Webb; John P Roberts; Fergus V Coakley; Benjamin M Yeh Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 3.959