Literature DB >> 8184038

Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging.

R Gilles1, J M Guinebretière, O Lucidarme, P Cluzel, G Janaud, J F Finet, A Tardivon, J Masselot, D Vanel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of contrast material-enhanced subtraction dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-three patients underwent surgical biopsy of a nonpalpable breast lesion. Their mammograms showed microcalcifications (n = 80), opacity (n = 52), architectural distortion (n = 10), or asymmetric density (n = 1). All patients underwent a preoperative gadolinium tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid-enhanced subtraction dynamic study. Any early contrast enhancement in the breast parenchyma was considered pathologic.
RESULTS: At histologic analysis, 27 intraductal carcinomas, 37 invasive carcinomas, and 79 benign lesions were found. Dynamic MR studies showed early contrast enhancement in 61 of 64 breast cancers (sensitivity, 95%) and in 37 of 79 benign lesions (specificity, 53%). Two invasive lobular carcinomas and one tubular carcinoma showed no early contrast enhancement.
CONCLUSION: Subtraction dynamic MR imaging may be helpful to rule out malignancy in nonpalpable breast tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8184038     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.191.3.8184038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

1.  MR lmaging of the Primary Breast Lymphoma: A Case Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation.

Authors:  F Fornasa; L Pinali; A Gasparini; E Toniolli; S Montemezzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; C Stockamp; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions?

Authors:  Gerda Leinsinger; Thomas Schlossbauer; Michael Scherr; Oliver Lange; Maximilian Reiser; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MR-guided breast biopsy and hook wire marking using a low-field (0.23 T) scanner with optical instrument tracking.

Authors:  Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Heli Reinikainen; Andreas M Blanco Sequeiros; Teuvo Vaara; Risto Ojala; Eija Pääkkö; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  MRI of the breast: comparison of MRI signals and histological characteristics of the same slices.

Authors:  Ritsu Kusama; Fumiyoshi Takayama; Shin-ichi Tsuchiya
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.309

7.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?

Authors:  Kathinka D Kurz; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Reinhart Willers; Dirk Blondin; Ulrich Mödder; Andreas Saleh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A high spatial resolution 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging technique for breast cancer with a short echo time.

Authors:  Jiani Hu; Yingjian Yu; Zhifeng Kou; Wei Huang; Quan Jiang; Yang Xuan; Tao Li; Vivek Sehgal; Cassann Blake; E Mark Haacke; Renate L Soulen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard?

Authors:  F Sardanelli; L Bacigalupo; L Carbonaro; A Esseridou; G M Giuseppetti; P Panizza; V Lattanzio; A Del Maschio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Vascular perfusion of choroidal melanoma by 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bruce M Buerk; Jose S Pulido; Ignacio Chiong; Robert Folberg; Deepak P Edward; Mark T Duffy; Keith R Thulborn
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.