Literature DB >> 16715240

Acetabular retroversion as a rare cause of chronic hip pain: recognition of the "figure-eight" sign.

Kevin P Banks1, David E Grayson.   

Abstract

While well-recognized in the orthopedic literature as a cause of chronic hip pain, acetabular retroversion has not been specifically described in the radiologic literature. Acetabular retroversion represents a particular form of hip dysplasia characterized by abnormal posterolateral orientation of the acetabulum. This pathophysiology predisposes the individual to subsequent anterior impingement of the femoral neck upon the anterior acetabular margin and fibrous labrum. Without treatment, cases may progress to damage of the anterior labrum and cartilage, with eventual early onset of osteoarthritic disease. This impinging condition has been described as occurring in isolation or as part of a complex dysplasia. We describe two cases of acetabular retroversion diagnosed by conventional radiographic evaluation of the pelvis, one in isolation and one occurring in the setting of a larger congenital syndrome. These cases illustrate the utility of the "figure-eight" sign in identifying abnormalities of acetabular version and thus assisting clinicians in properly identifying these individuals so that appropriate therapy may be instituted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16715240     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-006-0150-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain.

Authors:  D Reynolds; J Lucas; K Klaue
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-03

3.  Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; R Schoeniger; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; D F Kalbermatten; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Pelvic inclination and spatial orientation of the acetabulum. A radiographic, computed tomographic and clinical investigation.

Authors:  S Anda; S Svenningsen; T Grontvedt; P Benum
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Determination of acetabular coverage of the femoral head with use of a single anteroposterior radiograph. A new computerized technique.

Authors:  N Konishi; T Mieno
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  O Reikerås; I Bjerkreim; A Kolbenstvedt
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1983-02

8.  Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult.

Authors:  S B Murphy; P K Kijewski; M B Millis; A Harless
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.176

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Correlation of the cross-over ratio of the cross-over sign on conventional pelvic radiographs with computed tomography retroversion measurements.

Authors:  Clément M L Werner; Carol E Copeland; Jeff Stromberg; Thomas Ruckstuhl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Can the crossover sign be a reliable marker of global retroversion of the acetabulum?

Authors:  Seyed Ali Hashemi; Javad Dehghani; Amir Reza Vosoughi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Acetabular orientation variability and symmetry based on CT scans of adults.

Authors:  Omri Lubovsky; Eran Peleg; Leo Joskowicz; Meir Liebergall; Amal Khoury
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Pelvic positioning creates error in CT acetabular measurements.

Authors:  Harold J P van Bosse; Duron Lee; Eric R Henderson; Debra A Sala; David S Feldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  An algorithmic approach to surgical decision making in acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Lucas A Anderson; Jill A Erickson; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Gender and racial differences in focal and global acetabular version.

Authors:  Eric Tannenbaum; Nathan Kopydlowski; Matthew Smith; Asheesh Bedi; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Diagnostic Value of Ischial Spine Sign in Patients with Acetabular Retroversion.

Authors:  Mohamad Qoreishy; Hamid R S Hosseinzadeh; Ali Keipourfard; Arya Shoghli
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

8.  Correlation between radiographic measures of acetabular morphology with 3D femoral head coverage in patients with acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Benjamin J Hansen; Michael D Harris; Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Does pain and hip function improve 2 years after reverse periacetabular osteotomy? A follow-up study of 74 patients.

Authors:  Christina Nielsen Bræmer; Sarah Ankjær Langberg; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Søren Reinhold Jakobsen; Hugo Aleixo; Kjeld Søballe; Inger Mechlenburg
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2020-01-14

10.  Prevalence of radiographic findings of femoroacetabular impingement in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Kensuke Fukushima; Katsufumi Uchiyama; Naonobu Takahira; Mitsutoshi Moriya; Takeaki Yamamoto; Moritoshi Itoman; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.