S Mason1, P Coleman, C O'Keeffe, J Ratcliffe, J Nicholl. 1. Health Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. s.mason@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergency care practitioner (ECP) is a generic practitioner who combines extended nursing and paramedic skills. The "new" role emerged out of changing workforce initiatives intended to improve staff career opportunities in the National Health Service and ensure that patients' health needs are assessed appropriately. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of ECP Schemes in 17 sites, identify criteria contributing to a successful operational framework, analyse routinely collected data and provide a preliminary estimate of costs. METHODS: There were three methods used: (a) a quantitative survey, comprising a questionnaire to project leaders in 17 sites, and analysis of data collected routinely; (b) qualitative interpretation based on telephone interviews in six sites; and (c) an economic costing study. RESULTS: Of 17 sites, 14 (82.5%) responded to the questionnaire. Most ECPs (77.4%) had trained as paramedics. Skills and competencies have been extended through educational programmes, training, and assessment. Routine data indicate that 54% of patient contacts with the ECP service did not require a referral to another health professional or use of emergency transport. In a subset of six sites, factors contributing to a successful operational framework were strategic visions crossing traditional organisational boundaries and appropriately skilled workforce integrating flexibly with existing services. Issues across all schemes were patient safety, appropriate clinical governance, and supervision and workforce issues. On the data available, the mean cost per ECP patient contact is 24.00 pounds sterling, which is less than an ED contact of 55.00 pounds sterling. CONCLUSION: Indications are that the ECP schemes are moving forward in line with original objectives and could be having a significant impact on the emergency services workload.
BACKGROUND: The emergency care practitioner (ECP) is a generic practitioner who combines extended nursing and paramedic skills. The "new" role emerged out of changing workforce initiatives intended to improve staff career opportunities in the National Health Service and ensure that patients' health needs are assessed appropriately. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of ECP Schemes in 17 sites, identify criteria contributing to a successful operational framework, analyse routinely collected data and provide a preliminary estimate of costs. METHODS: There were three methods used: (a) a quantitative survey, comprising a questionnaire to project leaders in 17 sites, and analysis of data collected routinely; (b) qualitative interpretation based on telephone interviews in six sites; and (c) an economic costing study. RESULTS: Of 17 sites, 14 (82.5%) responded to the questionnaire. Most ECPs (77.4%) had trained as paramedics. Skills and competencies have been extended through educational programmes, training, and assessment. Routine data indicate that 54% of patient contacts with the ECP service did not require a referral to another health professional or use of emergency transport. In a subset of six sites, factors contributing to a successful operational framework were strategic visions crossing traditional organisational boundaries and appropriately skilled workforce integrating flexibly with existing services. Issues across all schemes were patient safety, appropriate clinical governance, and supervision and workforce issues. On the data available, the mean cost per ECP patient contact is 24.00 pounds sterling, which is less than an ED contact of 55.00 pounds sterling. CONCLUSION: Indications are that the ECP schemes are moving forward in line with original objectives and could be having a significant impact on the emergency services workload.
Authors: Salvatore Silvestri; Steven G Rothrock; Dan Kennedy; Jay Ladde; Marsha Bryant; Joseph Pagane Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2002 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Suzanne Mason; Emma Knowles; Brigitte Colwell; Simon Dixon; Jim Wardrope; Robert Gorringe; Helen Snooks; Julie Perrin; Jon Nicholl Journal: BMJ Date: 2007-10-04
Authors: Judith C Finn; Daniel M Fatovich; Glenn Arendts; David Mountain; Hideo Tohira; Teresa A Williams; Peter Sprivulis; Antonio Celenza; Tony Ahern; Alexandra P Bremner; Peter Cameron; Meredith L Borland; Ian R Rogers; Ian G Jacobs Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2013-07-15
Authors: Fiona E Lecky; Teri Reynolds; Olubukola Otesile; Sara Hollis; Janette Turner; Gordon Fuller; Ian Sammy; Jean Williams-Johnson; Heike Geduld; Andrea G Tenner; Simone French; Ishtar Govia; Julie Balen; Steve Goodacre; Sujan B Marahatta; Shaheem DeVries; Hendry R Sawe; Mohamed El-Shinawi; Juma Mfinanga; Andrés M Rubiano; Henda Chebbi; Sang Do Shin; Jose Maria E Ferrer; Mashyaneh Haddadi; Tsion Firew; Kathryn Taubert; Andrew Lee; Pauline Convocar; Sabariah Jamaluddin; Shahzmah Kotecha; Emad Abu Yaqeen; Katie Wells; Lee Wallis Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2020-08-31