OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits of paramedic practitioners assessing and, when possible, treating older people in the community after minor injury or illness. Paramedic practitioners have been trained with extended skills to assess, treat, and discharge older patients with minor acute conditions in the community. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial involving 56 clusters. Weeks were randomised to the paramedic practitioner service being active (intervention) or inactive (control) when the standard 999 service was available. SETTING:A large urban area in England. PARTICIPANTS: 3018 patients aged over 60 who called the emergency services (n=1549 intervention, n=1469 control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency department attendance or hospital admission between 0 and 28 days; interval from time of call to time of discharge; patients' satisfaction with the service received. RESULTS: Overall, patients in the intervention group were less likely to attend an emergency department (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.75) or require hospital admission within 28 days (0.87, 0.81 to 0.94) and experienced a shorter total episode time (235 v 278 minutes, 95% confidence interval for difference -60 minutes to -25 minutes). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to report being highly satisfied with their healthcare episode (relative risk 1.16, 1.09 to 1.23). There was no significant difference in 28 day mortality (0.87, 0.63 to 1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics with extended skills can provide a clinically effective alternative to standard ambulance transfer and treatment in an emergency department for elderly patients with acute minor conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27796329 [controlled-trials.com].
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits of paramedic practitioners assessing and, when possible, treating older people in the community after minor injury or illness. Paramedic practitioners have been trained with extended skills to assess, treat, and discharge older patients with minor acute conditions in the community. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial involving 56 clusters. Weeks were randomised to the paramedic practitioner service being active (intervention) or inactive (control) when the standard 999 service was available. SETTING: A large urban area in England. PARTICIPANTS: 3018 patients aged over 60 who called the emergency services (n=1549 intervention, n=1469 control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency department attendance or hospital admission between 0 and 28 days; interval from time of call to time of discharge; patients' satisfaction with the service received. RESULTS: Overall, patients in the intervention group were less likely to attend an emergency department (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.75) or require hospital admission within 28 days (0.87, 0.81 to 0.94) and experienced a shorter total episode time (235 v 278 minutes, 95% confidence interval for difference -60 minutes to -25 minutes). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to report being highly satisfied with their healthcare episode (relative risk 1.16, 1.09 to 1.23). There was no significant difference in 28 day mortality (0.87, 0.63 to 1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics with extended skills can provide a clinically effective alternative to standard ambulance transfer and treatment in an emergency department for elderly patients with acute minor conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27796329 [controlled-trials.com].
Authors: E Brooke Lerner; Anthony J Billittier; Daniel R Lance; David M Janicke; Josette A Teuscher Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Helen Snooks; Rebecca Anthony; Robin Chatters; Wai-Yee Cheung; Jeremy Dale; Rachael Donohoe; Sarah Gaze; Mary Halter; Marina Koniotou; Phillippa Logan; Ronan Lyons; Suzanne Mason; Jon Nicholl; Ceri Phillips; Judith Phillips; Ian Russell; A Niroshan Siriwardena; Mushtaq Wani; Alan Watkins; Richard Whitfield; Lynsey Wilson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Judith C Finn; Daniel M Fatovich; Glenn Arendts; David Mountain; Hideo Tohira; Teresa A Williams; Peter Sprivulis; Antonio Celenza; Tony Ahern; Alexandra P Bremner; Peter Cameron; Meredith L Borland; Ian R Rogers; Ian G Jacobs Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2013-07-15
Authors: A Stefanie Mikolaizak; Paul M Simpson; Anne Tiedemann; Stephen R Lord; Gideon A Caplan; Jason C Bendall; Kirsten Howard; Jacqueline C T Close Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ian R Drennan; Katie N Dainty; Paul Hoogeveen; Clare L Atzema; Norm Barrette; Gillian Hawker; Jeffrey S Hoch; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Jane Philpott; Chris Spearen; Walter Tavares; Linda Turner; Melissa Farrell; Tom Filosa; Jennifer Kane; Alex Kiss; Laurie J Morrison Journal: Trials Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 2.279