Literature DB >> 16712079

Making forecasts for chaotic physical processes.

Christopher M Danforth1, James A Yorke.   

Abstract

Making a prediction for a chaotic physical process involves specifying the probability associated with each possible outcome. Ensembles of solutions are frequently used to estimate this probability distribution. However, for a typical chaotic physical system and model of that system, no solution of remains close to for all time. We propose an alternative. This Letter shows how to inflate or systematically perturb the ensemble of solutions of so that some ensemble member remains close to for orders of magnitude longer than unperturbed solutions of . This is true even when the perturbations are significantly smaller than the model error.

Year:  2006        PMID: 16712079     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.144102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  5 in total

1.  Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Josh Bongard; Hod Lipson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The impact of uncertainty in a blood coagulation model.

Authors:  Christopher M Danforth; Thomas Orfeo; Kenneth G Mann; Kathleen E Brummel-Ziedins; Stephen J Everse
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Arousal elevation drives the development of oscillatory vocal output.

Authors:  Yisi S Zhang; John L Alvarez; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 4.  Towards model-based control of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Steven J Schiff
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Predicting the bounds of large chaotic systems using low-dimensional manifolds.

Authors:  Asger M Haugaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.