Literature DB >> 16709558

One-to-one and polyrhythmic temporal coordination in bimanual circle tracing.

John J Buchanan1, Young U Ryu.   

Abstract

The authors manipulated movement amplitude in a bimanual circle-tracing task to alter the natural tracing frequency of the arms. Participants (N = 14) traced different-diameter circles simultaneously with the two arms in either in-phase (0 degrees) or antiphase (180 degrees) coordination, using the index fingers or plastic styli. Movement amplitude altered the natural tracing frequency of the arms, as demonstrated by the following 2 findings: (a) The larger the difference in circle diameter, the larger was the shift from the fixed-point values of 0 degrees and 180 degrees, and the shift increased as movement frequency increased. Those results are consistent with the manipulation of delta omega in the bimanual pendulum paradigm. (b) Increasing movement frequency induced transitions from 1:1 to non-1:1 coordination, contrary to findings in previous investigations of polyrhythmic coordination. Tactile feedback played a minimal role in stabilizing bimanual coordination in the current tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16709558     DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.38.3.163-184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  11 in total

1.  The stability of rhythmic movement coordination depends on relative speed: the Bingham model supported.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Andrew D Wilson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

3.  Laterally focused attention modulates asymmetric coupling in rhythmic interlimb coordination.

Authors:  Harjo J de Poel; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-10-05

4.  Amplitude differences, spatial assimilation, and integrated feedback in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Noah J Dean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-02

6.  Do accuracy requirements change bimanual and unimanual control processes similarly?

Authors:  Chaoyi Wang; Jason B Boyle; Boyi Dai; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The organization of intralimb and interlimb synergies in response to different joint dynamics.

Authors:  Ya-weng Tseng; John P Scholz; James C Galloway
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Impossible is nothing: 5:3 and 4:3 multi-frequency bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; John J Buchanan; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Beyond in-phase and anti-phase coordination in a model of joint action.

Authors:  Daniele Avitabile; Piotr Słowiński; Benoit Bardy; Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Spontaneous bimanual independence during parallel tapping and sawing.

Authors:  Sandra Dorothee Starke; Chris Baber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.