Literature DB >> 16708358

The model for end-stage liver disease-based Japan Integrated Scoring system may have a better predictive ability for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing locoregional therapy.

Teh-Ia Huo1, Han-Chieh Lin, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Jaw-Ching Wu, Jen-Huei Chiang, Pui-Ching Lee, Shou-Dong Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Japan Integrated Scoring (JIS) system was revealed as a better model for outcome prediction compared with the Cancer of Liver Italian Program system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was better as a prognostic predictor for patients with cirrhosis compared with the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) system, which is a parameter used in the JIS system. The objective of the current study was to investigate the performance of the modified MELD-based JIS system.
METHODS: In the modified JIS system, the CTP class in the original JIS was replaced with MELD cut-off scores of <10, 10 to 14, and >14. The modified JIS system was compared with the original system in 276 patients with HCC who underwent locoregional therapy (transarterial chemoembolization or percutaneous injection).
RESULTS: The mean +/- standard error original JIS score was 1.8 +/- 1.0 (range, 0-4), compared with 2.0 +/- 1.1 (range, 0-5) for the modified JIS system (P < .001). Using mortality as the endpoint, the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the modified JIS system was 0.804 compared with 0.741 for the original JIS system (P = .008) at 12 months, and the AUC was 0.853 and 0.765, respectively (P < .001), at 24 months. Survival analysis showed that the modified JIS system had a better discriminatory ability for patients in different score groups and was more accurate for outcome prediction in the Cox multivariate model.
CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that the MELD-based, modified JIS system has improved predictive ability compared with the original system and is a more feasible model for clinical staging in patients with HCC who are undergoing locoregional therapy. Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16708358     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

1.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Thomas A Abrams; Edgar Ben-Josef; P Mark Bloomston; Jean F Botha; Bryan M Clary; Anne Covey; Steven A Curley; Michael I D'Angelica; Rene Davila; William D Ensminger; John F Gibbs; Daniel Laheru; Mokenge P Malafa; Jorge Marrero; Steven G Meranze; Sean J Mulvihill; James O Park; James A Posey; Jasgit Sachdev; Riad Salem; Elin R Sigurdson; Constantinos Sofocleous; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Alan P Venook; Laura Williams Goff; Yun Yen; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Overview of Staging Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Implications for Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Jan Hansmann; Charles E Ray
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  VEGFR-1 activation-induced MMP-9-dependent invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Li; Yuhua Zhu; Lihui Han; Wanhua Ren; Hui Liu; Chengyong Qin
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  Overexpression of miR-200a suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition of liver cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Jianlin Wang; Xisheng Yang; Bai Ruan; Bin Dai; Yuan Gao; Juanli Duan; Shibin Qu; Kaishan Tao; Kefeng Dou; Haimin Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-11-22

5.  Alcoholism worsens the survival of patients with hepatitis B virus and C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yun-Hsuan Lee; Chia-Yang Hsu; Cheng-Yuan Hsia; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Chien-Wei Su; Yi-You Chiou; Han-Chieh Lin; Teh-Ia Huo; Shou-Dong Lee
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 6.047

6.  Ascites in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: prevalence, associated factors, prognostic impact, and staging strategy.

Authors:  Chia-Yang Hsu; Yun-Hsuan Lee; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Cheng-Yuan Hsia; Chien-Wei Su; Han-Chieh Lin; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Yi-You Chiou; Fa-Yauh Lee; Teh-Ia Huo; Shou-Dong Lee
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 6.047

7.  Emergency adult living donor right lobe liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Xuehao Wang; Xiangcheng Li; Lianbao Kong; Beicheng Sun; Guoqiang Li; Xiaofen Qian; Feng Chen; Ke Wang; Sheng Lu; Liyong Pu; Ling Lu
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2007-07-01

8.  Comparison of five models for end-stage liver disease in predicting the survival rate of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying-Fen Hong; Zhan-Hong Chen; Xiao-Kun Ma; Xing Li; Dong-Hao Wu; Jie Chen; Min Dong; Li Wei; Tian-Tian Wang; Dan-Yun Ruan; Ze-Xiao Lin; Jing-Yun Wen; Qu Lin; Chang-Chang Jia; Xiang-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-11

9.  Osteopontin promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via the PI3K/AKT/Twist signaling pathway.

Authors:  Xinxin Yu; Yan Zheng; Xuchao Zhu; Xiaomei Gao; Chaoqun Wang; Yuanyuan Sheng; Wei Cheng; Lunxiu Qin; Ning Ren; Huliang Jia; Qiongzhu Dong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies.

Authors:  Puneeta Tandon; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.