Jan Gryczynski1, Courtney D Nordeck2, Ross D Martin3, Christopher Welsh4, Robert P Schwartz2, Shannon Gwin Mitchell2, Jerome H Jaffe2. 1. Friends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address: jgryczynski@friendsresearch.org. 2. Friends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. 3. Chesapeake Regional Information System for Our Patients, Inc., 7160 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite 100, Columbia, MD 21046, USA. 4. University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Substance use disorders are associated with inefficient and fragmented use of healthcare services. The Chesapeake Regional Information System for Our Patients, Inc. (CRISP) is a Health Information Exchange (HIE) linking disparate systems of care in the mid-Atlantic region. METHODS: This article describes applications of HIE for tracking hospital service utilization in substance use disorder clinical and services research, drawing upon data from one of the first studies approved to access the CRISP HIE. Participants were 200 medical/surgical inpatients with comorbid opioid, cocaine, and/or alcohol use disorder (45.5 % female; 56.5 % black; 77.5 % opioid use disorder; 42.0 % homeless). This study compared HIE-identified hospital service utilization with conventional methods of participant self-report during in-person research follow-ups (3-, 6-, and 12-months post-discharge) and electronic health record (EHR) review from the hospital system of the index admission. RESULTS: This sample exhibited high levels of hospital utilization, which would have been underestimated using conventional methods. Relying exclusively on self-report in the 12-month observation period would have identified only 33.8 % of 429 inpatient hospitalizations and 9.0 % of 1,287 ED visits, due to both loss-to-follow-up and failure to report events. Even combining self-report with single-system EHR review identified only 66.2 % of inpatient hospitalizations and 59.8 % of ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: CRISP HIE data were superior to conventional methods for ascertaining hospital service utilization in this sample of patients exhibiting high-volume and fragmented care. The use of HIE holds implications for improving rigor, safety, and efficiency in research studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Substance use disorders are associated with inefficient and fragmented use of healthcare services. The Chesapeake Regional Information System for Our Patients, Inc. (CRISP) is a Health Information Exchange (HIE) linking disparate systems of care in the mid-Atlantic region. METHODS: This article describes applications of HIE for tracking hospital service utilization in substance use disorder clinical and services research, drawing upon data from one of the first studies approved to access the CRISP HIE. Participants were 200 medical/surgical inpatients with comorbid opioid, cocaine, and/or alcohol use disorder (45.5 % female; 56.5 % black; 77.5 % opioid use disorder; 42.0 % homeless). This study compared HIE-identified hospital service utilization with conventional methods of participant self-report during in-person research follow-ups (3-, 6-, and 12-months post-discharge) and electronic health record (EHR) review from the hospital system of the index admission. RESULTS: This sample exhibited high levels of hospital utilization, which would have been underestimated using conventional methods. Relying exclusively on self-report in the 12-month observation period would have identified only 33.8 % of 429 inpatient hospitalizations and 9.0 % of 1,287 ED visits, due to both loss-to-follow-up and failure to report events. Even combining self-report with single-system EHR review identified only 66.2 % of inpatient hospitalizations and 59.8 % of ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: CRISP HIE data were superior to conventional methods for ascertaining hospital service utilization in this sample of patients exhibiting high-volume and fragmented care. The use of HIE holds implications for improving rigor, safety, and efficiency in research studies.
Authors: Alexander Y Walley; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Eugene C Lee; Shaula Forsythe; Veerappa K Chetty; Suzanne Mitchell; Brian W Jack Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Jan Gryczynski; Robert P Schwartz; Kevin E O'Grady; Lauren Restivo; Shannon G Mitchell; Jerome H Jaffe Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: William Hersh; Annette Totten; Karen Eden; Beth Devine; Paul Gorman; Steve Kassakian; Susan S Woods; Monica Daeges; Miranda Pappas; Marian S McDonagh Journal: Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) Date: 2015-12
Authors: Lauren K Whiteside; Marie C Vrablik; Joan Russo; Eileen M Bulger; Deepika Nehra; Kathleen Moloney; Douglas F Zatzick Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-01-28
Authors: Kristina L Bailey; Harlan Sayles; James Campbell; Neha Khalid; Madyson Anglim; Jana Ponce; Todd A Wyatt; James C McClay; Ellen L Burnham; Alfred Anzalone; Corrine Hanson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 3.928
Authors: Courtney D Nordeck; Christopher Welsh; Robert P Schwartz; Shannon G Mitchell; Kevin E O'Grady; Laura Dunlap; Gary Zarkin; Stephen Orme; Jan Gryczynski Journal: J Psychiatr Brain Sci Date: 2020-06-12