Literature DB >> 16707375

Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.

Andrew A Renshaw1, Edwin W Gould.   

Abstract

In many departments, some cases are reviewed routinely by a second pathologist within the same department before sign out. The value of this practice is not known. We reviewed and compared the disagreement and amendment rates for cases reviewed by 1 or more pathologists based on the results of blinded review. A total of 8,363 cases underwent blinded review, and of these, 1,087 (13.0%) were reviewed by more than 1 pathologist before sign out. The disagreement rate for cases reviewed by more than 1 pathologist (4.8%) was significantly lower than for cases reviewed by only 1 pathologist (6.9%; P = .004). The amendment rate decreased to 0.0% from 0.5%, but this decrease was not statistically significant (P = .12). Review of material by a second pathologist before sign out is associated with a lower disagreement rate. These results suggest second review of surgical pathology is of value, but the best selection of cases to be reviewed remains to be defined.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16707375     DOI: 10.1309/6A0R-AX9K-CR8V-WCG4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  8 in total

1.  The feasibility of computer-aided monitoring of the workflow in surgical pathology: a five-year experience.

Authors:  Chih-En Tseng; Hsiu-Huei Chiang; Liang-Yu Shih; Kai-Sheng Liao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A Comparative Study of the Perspectives of General and Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists about the Rate and Value of Second Referral in Assessment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologic Lesions.

Authors:  Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Alireza Liaghatdar; Neda Kargahi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies.

Authors:  Berta M Geller; Heidi D Nelson; Donald L Weaver; Paul D Frederick; Kimberly H Allison; Tracy Onega; Patricia A Carney; Anna N A Tosteson; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception.

Authors:  Berta M Geller; Heidi D Nelson; Patricia A Carney; Donald L Weaver; Tracy Onega; Kimberly H Allison; Paul D Frederick; Anna N A Tosteson; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Perceived and Real Histopathology Turnaround Time: A Teaching Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Akinfenwa Taoheed Atanda; Ibrahim Yusuf; Muhammad Sanusi Haruna
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

6.  Relevance of minor discrepancies at second pathology review in gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Lucas Minig; José Manuel Bosch; Carmen Illueca; Cristina Zorrero; José Miguel Cárdenas-Rebollo; Julia Cruz; Ignacio Romero
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-05-13

7.  Assessment of Second-Opinion Strategies for Diagnoses of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions.

Authors:  Michael W Piepkorn; Gary M Longton; Lisa M Reisch; David E Elder; Margaret S Pepe; Kathleen F Kerr; Anna N A Tosteson; Heidi D Nelson; Stevan Knezevich; Andrea Radick; Hannah Shucard; Tracy Onega; Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore; Raymond L Barnhill
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-10-02

8.  Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.

Authors:  Patricia Raciti; Jillian Sue; Rodrigo Ceballos; Ran Godrich; Jeremy D Kunz; Supriya Kapur; Victor Reuter; Leo Grady; Christopher Kanan; David S Klimstra; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 8.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.