Literature DB >> 32393768

Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.

Patricia Raciti1, Jillian Sue2, Rodrigo Ceballos2, Ran Godrich2, Jeremy D Kunz2, Supriya Kapur2, Victor Reuter3, Leo Grady2, Christopher Kanan2, David S Klimstra3, Thomas J Fuchs2,3.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most common cancer among men in the United States. The gold standard for detecting PrCa is the examination of prostate needle core biopsies. Diagnosis can be challenging, especially for small, well-differentiated cancers. Recently, machine learning algorithms have been developed for detecting PrCa in whole slide images (WSIs) with high test accuracy. However, the impact of these artificial intelligence systems on pathologic diagnosis is not known. To address this, we investigated how pathologists interact with Paige Prostate Alpha, a state-of-the-art PrCa detection system, in WSIs of prostate needle core biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Three AP-board certified pathologists assessed 304 anonymized prostate needle core biopsy WSIs in 8 hours. The pathologists classified each WSI as benign or cancerous. After ~4 weeks, pathologists were tasked with re-reviewing each WSI with the aid of Paige Prostate Alpha. For each WSI, Paige Prostate Alpha was used to perform cancer detection and, for WSIs where cancer was detected, the system marked the area where cancer was detected with the highest probability. The original diagnosis for each slide was rendered by genitourinary pathologists and incorporated any ancillary studies requested during the original diagnostic assessment. Against this ground truth, the pathologists and Paige Prostate Alpha were measured. Without Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists had an average sensitivity of 74% and an average specificity of 97%. With Paige Prostate Alpha, the average sensitivity for pathologists significantly increased to 90% with no statistically significant change in specificity. With Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists more often correctly classified smaller, lower grade tumors, and spent less time analyzing each WSI. Future studies will investigate if similar benefit is yielded when such a system is used to detect other forms of cancer in a setting that more closely emulates real practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32393768      PMCID: PMC9235852          DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   8.209


  18 in total

1.  Report of the Pathology Committee: false-positive and false-negative diagnoses of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T H Van der Kwast; C Lopes; P M Martikainen; C G Pihl; C Santonja; I Neetens; S Di Lollo; R F Hoedemaeker
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  The value of mandatory second opinion pathology review of prostate needle biopsy interpretation before radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fadi Brimo; Luciana Schultz; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  William J Catalona
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.456

4.  Use of Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Management Trends Across Risk Groups in the United States, 2010-2015.

Authors:  Brandon A Mahal; Santino Butler; Idalid Franco; Daniel E Spratt; Timothy R Rebbeck; Anthony V D'Amico; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Contemporary prostate biopsy reporting: insights from a survey of clinicians' use of pathology data.

Authors:  Murali Varma; Krishna Narahari; Malcolm Mason; Jon D Oxley; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  False-Negative Histopathologic Diagnosis of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chen Yang; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images.

Authors:  Gabriele Campanella; Matthew G Hanna; Luke Geneslaw; Allen Miraflor; Vitor Werneck Krauss Silva; Klaus J Busam; Edi Brogi; Victor E Reuter; David S Klimstra; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Impact of Deep Learning Assistance on the Histopathologic Review of Lymph Nodes for Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  David F Steiner; Robert MacDonald; Yun Liu; Peter Truszkowski; Jason D Hipp; Christopher Gammage; Florence Thng; Lily Peng; Martin C Stumpe
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Trends in the US and Canadian Pathologist Workforces From 2007 to 2017.

Authors:  David M Metter; Terence J Colgan; Stanley T Leung; Charles F Timmons; Jason Y Park
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-05-03
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice.

Authors:  Matthew G Hanna; Orly Ardon; Victor E Reuter; Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun; Christine England; David S Klimstra; Meera R Hameed
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Onur Yildirim; Sungmin Woo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Nanogenomics and Artificial Intelligence: A Dynamic Duo for the Fight Against Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Batla S Al-Sowayan; Alaa T Al-Shareeda
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-04-15

4.  A deep learning system for prostate cancer diagnosis and grading in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.

Authors:  Nitin Singhal; Shailesh Soni; Saikiran Bonthu; Nilanjan Chattopadhyay; Pranab Samanta; Uttara Joshi; Amit Jojera; Taher Chharchhodawala; Ankur Agarwal; Mahesh Desai; Arvind Ganpule
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Deep Learning Approaches and Applications in Toxicologic Histopathology: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Shima Mehrvar; Lauren E Himmel; Pradeep Babburi; Andrew L Goldberg; Magali Guffroy; Kyathanahalli Janardhan; Amanda L Krempley; Bhupinder Bawa
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Leveraging artificial intelligence to predict ERG gene fusion status in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vipulkumar Dadhania; Daniel Gonzalez; Mustafa Yousif; Jerome Cheng; Todd M Morgan; Daniel E Spratt; Zachery R Reichert; Rahul Mannan; Xiaoming Wang; Anya Chinnaiyan; Xuhong Cao; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Liron Pantanowitz; Rohit Mehra
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.

Authors:  Leonard M da Silva; Emilio M Pereira; Paulo Go Salles; Ran Godrich; Rodrigo Ceballos; Jeremy D Kunz; Adam Casson; Julian Viret; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Carlos Gil Ferreira; Bruno Ferrari; Brandon Rothrock; Patricia Raciti; Victor Reuter; Belma Dogdas; George DeMuth; Jillian Sue; Christopher Kanan; Leo Grady; Thomas J Fuchs; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  An independent assessment of an artificial intelligence system for prostate cancer detection shows strong diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Sudhir Perincheri; Angelique Wolf Levi; Romulo Celli; Peter Gershkovich; David Rimm; Jon Stanley Morrow; Brandon Rothrock; Patricia Raciti; David Klimstra; John Sinard
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Regen med therapeutic opportunities for fighting COVID-19.

Authors:  Anthony Atala; Alicia Henn; Martha Lundberg; Taby Ahsan; Jordan Greenberg; Jeff Krukin; Steven Lynum; Cat Lutz; Kyle Cetrulo; Mohammad Albanna; Taciana Pereira; Shannon Eaker; Joshua Hunsberger
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 6.940

10.  A Deep Learning Model for Prostate Adenocarcinoma Classification in Needle Biopsy Whole-Slide Images Using Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Masayuki Tsuneki; Makoto Abe; Fahdi Kanavati
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.