Literature DB >> 16706970

Incorrect use of thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in medical and surgical patients: results of a multicentric, observational and cross-sectional study in Brazil.

D Deheinzelin1, A L Braga, L C Martins, M A Martins, A Hernandez, W B Yoshida, F Maffei, M Monachini, D Calderaro, W Campos, G T Sguizzatto, B Caramelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although effective strategies for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are widely available, a significant number of patients still develop VTE because appropriate thromboprophylaxis is not correctly prescribed. We conducted this study to estimate the risk profile for VTE and the employment of adequate thromboprophylaxis procedures in patients admitted to hospitals in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.
METHODS: Four hospitals were included in this study. Data on risk factors for VTE and prescription of pharmacological and non-pharmacological thromboprophylaxis were collected from 1454 randomly chosen patients (589 surgical and 865 clinical). Case report forms were filled according to medical and nursing records. Physicians were unaware of the survey. Three risk assessment models were used: American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Guidelines, Caprini score, and the International Union of Angiololy Consensus Statement (IUAS). The ACCP score classifies VTE risk in surgical patients and the others classify VTE risk in surgical and clinical patients. Contingency tables were built presenting the joined distribution of the risk score and the prescription of any pharmacological and non-pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (yes or no).
RESULTS: According to the Caprini score, 29% of the patients with the highest risk for VTE were not prescribed any thromboprophylaxis. Considering the patients under moderate, high or highest risk who should be receiving prophylaxis, 37% and 29% were not prescribed thromboprophylaxis according to ACCP (surgical patients) and IUAS risk scores, respectively. In contrast, 27% and 42% of the patients at low risk of VTE, according to Caprini and IUAS scores, respectively, had thromboprophylaxis prescribed.
CONCLUSION: Despite the existence of several guidelines, this study demonstrates that adequate thromboprophylaxis is not correctly prescribed: high-risk patients are under-treated and low-risk patients are over-treated. This condition must be changed to insure that patients receive adequate treatment for the prevention of thromboembolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16706970     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01981.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  25 in total

1.  Hip fracture: heparin is for thromboembolic prophylaxis.

Authors:  Michael L Jenkinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-15

2.  Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in general surgery: guidelines differ and we still need local policies.

Authors:  D Veeramootoo; L Harrower; R Saunders; D Robinson; W B Campbell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Procedure-specific venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a paradigm from colectomy surgery.

Authors:  Peter K Henke; Shipra Arya; Chris Pannucci; Jim Kubus; Samantha Hendren; Michael Engelsbe; Darrell Campbell
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  3rd Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Pai Ching Yu; Bruno Caramelli; André Coelho Marques; Daniela Calderaro; Luciana Savoy Fornari; Claudio Pinho; Alina Coutinho Rodrigues Feitosa; Carisi Anne Polanczyk; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Carlos Jardim; Carolina L Z Vieira; Debora Y M Nakamura; Denise Iezzi; Dirk Schreen; Eduardo Leal Adam; Elbio Antonio D'Amico; Emerson Q de Lima; Emmanuel de Almeida Burdmann; Enrique Indalecio Pachón Mateo; Fabiana Goulart Marcondes Braga; Fabio S Machado; Flavio J de Paula; Gabriel Assis Lopes do Carmo; Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; Gustavo Faibischew Prado; Heno Ferreira Lopes; João R C Fernandes; José J G de Lima; Luciana Sacilotto; Luciano Ferreira Drager; Luciano Janussi Vacanti; Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde; Luis F L Prada; Luis Henrique Wolff Gowdak; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Maristela Camargo Monachini; Milena Frota Macatrão-Costa; Milena Ribeiro Paixão; Mucio Tavares de Oliveira; Patricia Cury; Paula R Villaça; Pedro Silvio Farsky; Rinaldo F Siciliano; Roberto Henrique Heinisch; Rogerio Souza; Sandra F M Gualandro; Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi; Wilson Mathias
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.000

5. 

Authors:  André Arpad Faludi; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Ana Paula Marte Chacra; Henrique Tria Bianco; Abrahão Afiune; Adriana Bertolami; Alexandre C Pereira; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Andrei C Sposito; Antonio Carlos Palandri Chagas; Antonio Casella; Antônio Felipe Simão; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar; Bruno Caramelli; Carlos Costa Magalhães; Carlos Eduardo Negrão; Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira; Carlos Scherr; Claudine Maria Alves Feio; Cristiane Kovacs; Daniel Branco de Araújo; Daniel Magnoni; Daniela Calderaro; Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Edgard Pessoa de Mello; Elizabeth Regina Giunco Alexandre; Emília Inoue Sato; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Fabiana Hanna Rached; Fábio César Dos Santos; Fernando Henpin Yue Cesena; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Henrique Andrade Rodrigues da Fonseca; Hermes Toros Xavier; Isabela Cardoso Pimentel Mota; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Jaqueline Scholz Issa; Jayme Diament; João Bosco Pesquero; José Ernesto Dos Santos; José Rocha Faria; José Xavier de Melo; Juliana Tieko Kato; Kerginaldo Paulo Torres; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Márcio Hiroshi Miname; Marileia Scartezini; Neusa Assumpta Forti; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Raul Cavalcante Maranhão; Raul Dias Dos Santos; Renato Jorge Alves; Roberta Lara Cassani; Roberto Tadeu Barcellos Betti; Tales de Carvalho; Tânia Leme da Rocha Martinez; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Wilson Salgado
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 6.  Venous thromboembolism and cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Celso Arrais Rodrigues; Renata Ferrarotto; Roberto Kalil Filho; Yana A S Novis; Paulo M G Hoff
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  The AVAIL ME study: a multinational survey of VTE risk and prophylaxis.

Authors:  Ali T Taher; Joseph Aoun; Pascale Salameh
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Review of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients attending Cork University Hospital.

Authors:  Stephen Byrne; Daniel Timothy Weaver
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-03-15

9.  Risk stratification for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients in a developing country: a prospective study.

Authors:  Abdallah Awidi; Nathir Obeidat; Ahmad Magablah; Nazzal Bsoul
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Assessment of risk and prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in medically ill patients during their early days of hospital stay at a tertiary care center in a developing country.

Authors:  Ambarish Pandey; Nivedita Patni; Mansher Singh; Randeep Guleria
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.