Literature DB >> 16704993

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies.

E Fragouli1, D Wells, A Thornhill, P Serhal, M J W Faed, J C Harper, J D A Delhanty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Classical cytogenetic methods and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) have been employed for the analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in human oocytes. However, these methods are limited by the need to spread the sample on a microscope slide, a process that risks artefactual chromosome loss. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a DNA-based method that enables the investigation of the entire chromosome complement. We optimized and evaluated a CGH protocol for the chromosomal analysis of first polar bodies (PBs) and oocytes. The protocol was then employed to obtain a detailed picture of meiosis I errors in human oogenesis.
METHODS: 107 MII oocyte-PB complexes were examined using whole genome amplification (WGA) and CGH.
RESULTS: Data was obtained for 100 complexes, donated from 46 patients of average age 32.5 (range 18-42). 22 complexes from 15 patients were abnormal, giving an aneuploidy rate of 22%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this study more than double the quantity of CGH data from female gametes currently available. Abnormalities caused by whole chromosome non-disjunction, unbalanced chromatid predivision and chromosome breakage were reliably identified using the CGH protocol. Analysis of the data revealed a preferential participation of chromosome X and the smaller autosomes in aneuploidy and provided further evidence for the existence of age-independent factors in female aneuploidy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16704993     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  24 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic changes in gene expression during human early embryo development: from fundamental aspects to clinical applications.

Authors:  Said Assou; Imène Boumela; Delphine Haouzi; Tal Anahory; Hervé Dechaud; John De Vos; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Chromosomal characteristics at cleavage and blastocyst stages from the same embryos.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Nan Zhao; Xiaozhu Wang; Jie Qiao; Ping Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Re-analysis of aneuploidy blastocysts with an inner cell mass and different regional trophectoderm cells.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Liying Yan; Sijia Lu; Nan Zhao; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Whole genome amplification in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Ying-ming Zheng; Ning Wang; Lei Li; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Predicting aneuploidy in human oocytes: key factors which affect the meiotic process.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; G Cavallini; A Crippa; A Capoti; S Resta; F Robles; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Non-meiotic chromosome instability in human immature oocytes.

Authors:  Gemma Daina; Laia Ramos; Mariona Rius; Albert Obradors; Javier Del Rey; Magda Giralt; Mercedes Campillo; Esther Velilla; Aïda Pujol; Olga Martinez-Pasarell; Jordi Benet; Joaquima Navarro
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Gamete cytogenetic study in couples with implantation failure: aneuploidy rate is increased in both couple members.

Authors:  F Vialard; I Hammoud; D Molina-Gomes; R Wainer; M Bergere; M Albert; M Bailly; P de Mazancourt; J Selva
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol.

Authors:  D S Johnson; G Gemelos; J Baner; A Ryan; C Cinnioglu; M Banjevic; R Ross; M Alper; B Barrett; J Frederick; D Potter; B Behr; M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.