Literature DB >> 16703544

Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of tendency oriented perimetry in glaucoma.

M Gonzalez de la Rosa1, M Gonzalez-Hernandez, J Garcia Feijoo, J Morales, A Azuara-Blanco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic capability of tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in glaucoma.
METHODS: A): The diagnostic accuracy of mean defect (MD), square-root of the loss variance (s LV), and number of pathologic points (NPP) was calculated in 295 normal and 414 glaucoma eyes (179 early, 112 moderate, and 123 advanced) examined with TOP. B): Threshold fluctuation (F) and its relationship with the loss variance (LV) was measured in 34 normal and 33 glaucoma eyes (mean MD=3 dB; SD=3.9) for TOP and for full-threshold perimetry (FT). C): Twenty-eight eyes with stable glaucoma (mean MD=9.5 dB; SD=7.2) were examined six times to quantify LV error. D): TOP and FT were tested with the simulation program PeriSim using different behavior models.
RESULTS: A): The best diagnostic index in early glaucoma (MD<6dB) was sLV (specificity=90.2%, sensitivity=84.9). The three indices had similar precision in moderate and severe glaucoma. B): Threshold fluctuation and sLV were better correlated in TOP (r=0.72, p<0.01) than in FT (r=0.62, p<0.01). For normal subjects, in FT the incidence of F<2 dB was 8.82% and s LV<1.5 dB 5.88%. The same frequencies in TOP were 67.65% and 55.88%. C): Averaging six examinations reduced the sLV val ue by 22%. D): The threshold estimation error increased 1 dB in TOP in relation to FT for the same patient's behavior, but the error in TOP was lower than i n FT when the worst behavior was modeled.
CONCLUSIONS: TOP is a good discriminator between glaucoma and normality. Perimetry results overestimate the real sLV value. TOP's high diagnostic ability is probably associated to the algorithm design and to less contaminating influences during the examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16703544     DOI: 10.1177/112067210601600211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  5 in total

1.  Stabilization and comparison of TOP and Bracketing perimetric strategies using a threshold spatial filter.

Authors:  Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa; Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez; Tinguaro Diaz Aleman; Manuel Sanchez Mendez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Pulsar perimetry. A review and new results].

Authors:  M Gonzalez de la Rosa; M Gonzalez-Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Diagnostic ability of Humphrey perimetry, Octopus perimetry, and optical coherence tomography for glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  B Monsalve; A Ferreras; P Calvo; J A Urcola; M Figus; J Monsalve; P Frezzotti
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Comparing the usefulness of a new algorithm to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression in glaucoma patients, in comparison to the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm.

Authors:  Hiroshi Murata; Ryo Asaoka; Yuri Fujino; Masato Matsuura; Kazunori Hirasawa; Satoshi Shimada; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.908

5.  Progression to blindness in 20 years among patients with glaucomatous visual field loss in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines.

Authors:  Cathleen Camille Cabrera; Joseph Anthony Tumbocon; John Mark de Leon
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.