Literature DB >> 16702297

Opinions and practices of wisconsin dairy producers about biosecurity and animal well-being.

F G H Hoe1, P L Ruegg.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize opinions and practices of Wisconsin dairy producers about biosecurity and animal wellbeing. Wisconsin dairy producers were surveyed using a mailed questionnaire and responder herds were categorized based on the number of lactating cows: very small herds (< or =50 lactating cows; n = 279); small herds (51 to 100 lactating cows; n = 202); medium herds (101 to 200 lactating cows; n = 42); and large herds (>200 lactating cows; n = 37). Producers from large herds adopted more biosecurity practices than those from small herds, but biosecurity risks were common. Almost half of the responders indicated that they purchased cattle, but few (49.4%) performed diagnostic testing of those cattle. The frequency of diagnostic testing and examination of purchased cattle increased with herd size. Producers generally (80%) believed that they used the "right amount" of antibiotics, but the use of written treatment protocols increased with herd size. Producers from large and medium herds reported much higher usage of computerized (65.7 and 17.5%, respectively) and paper records (42.9 and 22.5%, respectively) compared with producers from smaller herds. Almost all (92.6%) believed that Johne's disease was an important issue for the dairy industry, but only 9% had enrolled in the official Wisconsin control program. Most producers (88.6%) believed that dehorning caused at least a small amount of pain, but the majority (81%) did not use local anesthetics. Producers minimized risks with which they were most familiar. Drinking raw milk was not considered a human health risk by almost half the responders, whereas bovine spongiform encephalopathy was considered "no risk" to only 37%. Raw milk was consumed by more than 60%, but regular consumption of raw milk decreased from 47.7% (very small herds) to 24.3% (large herds); perception of the risk of raw milk increased from 46.2% (very small herds) to 56.8% (large herds) with herd size. Larger farms had more knowledge of personal health risks related to zoonotic pathogens. Overall, most management practices were associated with herd size, but many beliefs regarding important dairy farm issues were consistent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16702297     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72301-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  21 in total

1.  Antimicrobial dispensing by Ontario dairy veterinarians.

Authors:  David F Léger; Nathalie C Newby; Richard Reid-Smith; Neil Anderson; David L Pearl; Kerry D Lissemore; David F Kelton
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Comparison of an online learning module to hands-on training in teaching a cautery disbudding technique for dairy calves including cornual nerve block application.

Authors:  Charlotte B Winder; Stephen J LeBlanc; Derek B Haley; Kerry D Lissemore; M Ann Godkin; Todd F Duffield
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 3.  Invited review: The role of contagious disease in udder health.

Authors:  H W Barkema; M J Green; A J Bradley; R N Zadoks
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Pharmacokinetics and effect of intravenous meloxicam in weaned Holstein calves following scoop dehorning without local anesthesia.

Authors:  Johann F Coetzee; Ruby A Mosher; Butch KuKanich; Ronette Gehring; Brad Robert; J Brandon Reinbold; Brad J White
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Maria J Hötzel; Cibele Longo; Lucas F Balcão; Clarissa S Cardoso; João H C Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Raw milk consumption among patients with non-outbreak-related enteric infections, Minnesota, USA, 2001-2010.

Authors:  Trisha J Robinson; Joni M Scheftel; Kirk E Smith
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Sublingual administration of detomidine to calves prior to disbudding: a comparison with the intravenous route.

Authors:  Ann-Helena Hokkanen; Marja R Raekallio; Kati Salla; Laura Hänninen; Elina Viitasaari; Marianna Norring; Satu Raussi; Valtteri M Rinne; Mika Scheinin; Outi M Vainio
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.648

10.  Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.

Authors:  Karin Kuster; Marie-Eve Cousin; Thomas Jemmi; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.