Literature DB >> 26232091

Contrasting environments shape thermal physiology across the spatial range of the sandhopper Talorchestia capensis.

Simone Baldanzi1,2,3, Nicolas F Weidberg4,5, Marco Fusi6, Stefano Cannicci7,8, Christopher D McQuaid4, Francesca Porri4,9.   

Abstract

Integrating thermal physiology and species range extent can contribute to a better understanding of the likely effects of climate change on natural populations. Generally, broadly distributed species show variation in thermal physiology between populations. Within their distributional ranges, populations at the edges are assumed to experience more challenging environments than central populations (fundamental niche breadth hypothesis). We have investigated differences in thermal tolerance and thermal sensitivity under increasing/decreasing temperatures among geographically separated populations of the sandhopper Talorchestia capensis along the South African coasts. We tested whether the thermal tolerance and thermal sensitivity of T. capensis differ between central and marginal populations using a non-parametric constraint space analysis. We linked thermal sensitivity to environmental history by using historical climatic data to evaluate whether individual responses to temperature could be related to natural long-term fluctuations in air temperatures. Our results demonstrate that there were significant differences in the thermal response of T. capensis populations to both increasing/decreasing temperatures. Thermal sensitivity (for increasing temperatures only) was negatively related to temperature variability and positively related to temperature predictability. Two different models fitted the geographical distribution of thermal sensitivity and thermal tolerance. Our results confirm that widespread species show differences in physiology among populations by providing evidence of contrasting thermal responses in individuals subject to different environmental conditions at the limits of the species' spatial range. When considering the complex interactions between individual physiology and species ranges, it is not sufficient to consider mean environmental temperatures, or even temperature variability; the predictability of that variability may be critical.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACH; Climate change; Climatic variability; Macrophysiology; Temperature predictability; Thermal sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26232091     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3404-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  33 in total

1.  Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Upper thermal tolerances of the beachflea Orchestia gammarellus (Pallas) (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Talitridae) associated with hot springs in Iceland.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.171

3.  Changes in gene expression associated with acclimation to constant temperatures and fluctuating daily temperatures in an annual killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus.

Authors:  Jason E Podrabsky; George N Somero
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance.

Authors:  Hans O Pörtner; Rainer Knust
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Macrophysiology for a changing world.

Authors:  Steven L Chown; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  The physiology of climate change: how potentials for acclimatization and genetic adaptation will determine 'winners' and 'losers'.

Authors:  G N Somero
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Limited potential for adaptation to climate change in a broadly distributed marine crustacean.

Authors:  Morgan W Kelly; Eric Sanford; Richard K Grosberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Isopods failed to acclimate their thermal sensitivity of locomotor performance during predictable or stochastic cooling.

Authors:  Matthew S Schuler; Brandon S Cooper; Jonathan J Storm; Michael W Sears; Michael J Angilletta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Thermal variability increases the impact of autumnal warming and drives metabolic depression in an overwintering butterfly.

Authors:  Caroline M Williams; Katie E Marshall; Heath A MacMillan; Jason D K Dzurisin; Jessica J Hellmann; Brent J Sinclair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temperature variation makes ectotherms more sensitive to climate change.

Authors:  Krijn P Paaijmans; Rebecca L Heinig; Rebecca A Seliga; Justine I Blanford; Simon Blanford; Courtney C Murdock; Matthew B Thomas
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  3 in total

1.  Thermal tolerance and survival responses to scenarios of experimental climatic change: changing thermal variability reduces the heat and cold tolerance in a fly.

Authors:  Francisco Bozinovic; Nadia R Medina; José M Alruiz; Grisel Cavieres; Pablo Sabat
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Locomotor performance of cane toads differs between native-range and invasive populations.

Authors:  Georgia Kosmala; Keith Christian; Gregory Brown; Richard Shine
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Predictability of Precipitation Over the Conterminous U.S. Based on the CMIP5 Multi-Model Ensemble.

Authors:  Mingkai Jiang; Benjamin S Felzer; Dork Sahagian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.