Literature DB >> 16701405

Hiding in plain sight.

Thomas N Sherratt1, Arash Rashed, Christopher D Beatty.   

Abstract

Although the principles of disruptive colouration are widely believed to explain a variety of animal colour patterns, there has been no field evidence that it works to reduce the detection rates of natural prey. In a recent paper, Cuthill et al. successfully address this shortfall, separating the benefits of background matching from those of disruptive colouration. Their results provide the first definitive field support for this long-recognized phenomenon and suggest several new avenues of research.

Year:  2005        PMID: 16701405     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  10 in total

1.  Function of blue iridescence in tropical understorey plants.

Authors:  Katherine R Thomas; Mathias Kolle; Heather M Whitney; Beverley J Glover; Ullrich Steiner
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.

Authors:  H Martin Schaefer; Nina Stobbe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Disruptive and cryptic coloration.

Authors:  John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.

Authors:  Stewart Fraser; Alison Callahan; Dana Klassen; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Enhancement of chromatic contrast increases predation risk for striped butterflies.

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Fine nanostructural variation in the wing pattern of a moth Chiasmia eleonora Cramer (1780).

Authors:  Shaunak Ghosh; Monalisa Mishra
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill; Amy M M Windsor; Hannah J Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Warning coloration can be disruptive: aposematic marginal wing patterning in the wood tiger moth.

Authors:  Atsushi Honma; Johanna Mappes; Janne K Valkonen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.