Literature DB >> 16701315

Lepidopteran microsatellite DNA: redundant but promising.

De-Xing Zhang1.   

Abstract

The development of microsatellite DNA markers for use with butterflies and moths is extremely difficult for no apparent reason. New findings demonstrate that many lepidopteran microsatellite sequences exist in multiple copies in the genome, and have similar or almost identical flanking regions. These findings provide a compelling explanation for the low efficiency of microsatellite isolation in Lepidoptera, and might also shed light on the evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite sequences in these insects and other organisms.

Year:  2004        PMID: 16701315     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  37 in total

1.  Comparative genomic analysis reveals species-dependent complexities that explain difficulties with microsatellite marker development in molluscs.

Authors:  C E McInerney; A L Allcock; M P Johnson; D A Bailie; P A Prodöhl
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Lessons from a beetle and an ant: coping with taxon-dependent differences in microsatellite development success.

Authors:  Wolfgang Arthofer; Birgit C Schlick-Steiner; Florian M Steiner; Dimitrios N Avtzis; Ross H Crozier; Christian Stauffer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Rapidly developing functional genomics in ecological model systems via 454 transcriptome sequencing.

Authors:  Christopher W Wheat
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  High nucleotide diversity and limited linkage disequilibrium in Helicoverpa armigera facilitates the detection of a selective sweep.

Authors:  S V Song; S Downes; T Parker; J G Oakeshott; C Robin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Genetic variation in ecoraces of tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta using SSR markers.

Authors:  G Renuka; G Shamitha
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  A helitron-like transposon superfamily from lepidoptera disrupts (GAAA)(n) microsatellites and is responsible for flanking sequence similarity within a microsatellite family.

Authors:  Brad S Coates; Douglas V Sumerford; Richard L Hellmich; Leslie C Lewis
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Local mutagenic impact of insertions of LTR retrotransposons on the mouse genome.

Authors:  Erick Desmarais; Khalid Belkhir; John Carlos Garza; François Bonhomme
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-29       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Development of 26 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers for the highly endangered fan mussel Pinna nobilis and cross-species amplification.

Authors:  Claire Peyran; Serge Planes; Nathalie Tolou; Guillaume Iwankow; Emilie Boissin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Generation of microsatellite repeat families by RTE retrotransposons in lepidopteran genomes.

Authors:  Wee Tek Tay; Gajanan T Behere; Philip Batterham; David G Heckel
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Rapid microsatellite isolation from a butterfly by de novo transcriptome sequencing: performance and a comparison with AFLP-derived distances.

Authors:  Alexander S Mikheyev; Tanya Vo; Brian Wee; Michael C Singer; Camille Parmesan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.