OBJECTIVE: Emdogain (EMD) is a protein extract purified from porcine enamel and has been introduced in clinical practice to obtain periodontal regeneration. EMD is composed mainly of amelogenins (90%), while the remaining 10% is composed of non-amelogenin enamel matrix proteins such as enamelins, tuftelin, amelin and ameloblastin. Enamel matrix proteins seem to be involved in root formation. EMD has been reported to promote proliferation, migration, adhesion and differentiation of cells associated with healing periodontal tissues in vivo. DESIGN: How this protein acts on osteoblasts is poorly understood. We therefore attempted to address this question by using a microarray technique to identify genes that are differently regulated in osteoblasts exposed to enamel matrix proteins. RESULTS: By using DNA microarrays containing 20,000 genes, we identified several upregulated and downregulated genes in the osteoblast-like cell line (MG-63) cultured with enamel matrix proteins (Emd). The differentially expressed genes cover a broad range of functional activities: (i) signaling transduction, (ii) transcription, (iii) translation, (iv) cell cycle regulation, proliferation and apoptosis, (v) immune system, (vi) vesicular transport and lysosome activity, and (vii) cytoskeleton, cell adhesion and extracellular matrix production. CONCLUSIONS: The data reported are the first genome-wide scan of the effect of enamel matrix proteins on osteoblast-like cells. These results can contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of bone regeneration and as a model for comparing other materials with similar clinical effects.
OBJECTIVE: Emdogain (EMD) is a protein extract purified from porcine enamel and has been introduced in clinical practice to obtain periodontal regeneration. EMD is composed mainly of amelogenins (90%), while the remaining 10% is composed of non-amelogenin enamel matrix proteins such as enamelins, tuftelin, amelin and ameloblastin. Enamel matrix proteins seem to be involved in root formation. EMD has been reported to promote proliferation, migration, adhesion and differentiation of cells associated with healing periodontal tissues in vivo. DESIGN: How this protein acts on osteoblasts is poorly understood. We therefore attempted to address this question by using a microarray technique to identify genes that are differently regulated in osteoblasts exposed to enamel matrix proteins. RESULTS: By using DNA microarrays containing 20,000 genes, we identified several upregulated and downregulated genes in the osteoblast-like cell line (MG-63) cultured with enamel matrix proteins (Emd). The differentially expressed genes cover a broad range of functional activities: (i) signaling transduction, (ii) transcription, (iii) translation, (iv) cell cycle regulation, proliferation and apoptosis, (v) immune system, (vi) vesicular transport and lysosome activity, and (vii) cytoskeleton, cell adhesion and extracellular matrix production. CONCLUSIONS: The data reported are the first genome-wide scan of the effect of enamel matrix proteins on osteoblast-like cells. These results can contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of bone regeneration and as a model for comparing other materials with similar clinical effects.
Authors: Margherita Tumedei; Eitan Mijiritsky; Carlos Fernando Mourão; Adriano Piattelli; Marco Degidi; Carlo Mangano; Giovanna Iezzi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Annalisa Palmieri; Furio Pezzetti; Giorgio Brunelli; Ilaria Zollino; Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Marcella Martinelli; Luca Scapoli; Marzia Arlotti; Elena Masiero; Francesco Carinci Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2008-02-06 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Richard J Miron; Erik Hedbom; Sabrina Ruggiero; Dieter D Bosshardt; Yufeng Zhang; Corinna Mauth; Anja C Gemperli; Tateyuki Iizuka; Daniel Buser; Anton Sculean Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Barbara D Boyan; David A Hart; Roger M Enoka; Daniel P Nicolella; Eileen Resnick; Karen J Berkley; Kathleen A Sluka; C Kent Kwoh; Laura L Tosi; Mary I O'Connor; Richard D Coutts; Wendy M Kohrt Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 5.027