Literature DB >> 16699152

Wild bird mortality and West Nile virus surveillance: biases associated with detection, reporting, and carcass persistence.

Marsha R Ward1, David E Stallknecht, Juanette Willis, Michael J Conroy, William R Davidson.   

Abstract

Surveillance targeting dead wild birds, in particular American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos), plays a critical role in West Nile virus (WNV) surveillance in the United States. Using crow decoy surrogates, detection and reporting of crow carcasses within urban and rural environments of DeKalb County, Georgia were assessed for potential biases that might occur in the county's WNV surveillance program. In each of two replicated trials, during July and September 2003, 400 decoys were labeled with reporting instructions and distributed along randomly chosen routes throughout designated urban and rural areas within DeKalb County. Information-theoretic methods were used to compare alternative models incorporating the effects of area and trial on probabilities of detection and reporting. The model with the best empirical support included the effects of area on both detection and reporting of decoys. The proportion of decoys detected in the urban area (0.605, SE=0.024) was approximately twice that of the rural area (0.293, SE=0.023), and the proportion of decoys reported in the urban area (0.273, SE=0.023) was approximately three times that of the rural area (0.103, SE=0.028). These results suggest that human density and associated factors can substantially influence dead crow detection and reporting and, thus, the perceived distribution of WNV. In a second and separate study, the persistence and fate of American crow and house sparrow (Passer domesticus) carcasses were assessed in urban and rural environments in Athens-Clarke, Madison, and Oconee counties, Georgia. Two replicated trials using 96 carcasses of each species were conducted during July and September 2004. For a portion of the carcasses, motion sensitive cameras were used to monitor scavenging species visits. Most carcasses (82%) disappeared or were decayed by the end of the 6-day study. Carcass persistence averaged 1.6 days in rural areas and 2.1 days in urban areas. We analyzed carcass persistence rates using a known-fate model framework in program MARK. Model selection based on Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC) indicated that the best model explaining carcass persistence rates included species and number of days of exposure; however, the model including area and number of days of exposure received approximately equal support. Model-averaged carcass persistence rates were higher for urban areas and for crow carcasses. Six mammalian and one avian species were documented scavenging upon carcasses. Dead wild birds could represent potential sources of oral WNV exposure to these scavenging species. Species composition of the scavenger assemblage was similar in urban and rural areas but "scavenging pressure" was greater in rural areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16699152     DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-42.1.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  18 in total

Review 1.  Citizen Science and Wildlife Disease Surveillance.

Authors:  Becki Lawson; Silviu O Petrovan; Andrew A Cunningham
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Scavenging of rodent carcasses following simulated mortality due to field applications of anticoagulant rodenticide.

Authors:  Julie Montaz; Marion Jacquot; Michaël Coeurdassier
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Predicted and observed mortality from vector-borne disease in small songbirds.

Authors:  A Marm Kilpatrick; Ryan J Peters; Alan P Dupuis; Matthew J Jones; Peter P Marra; Laura D Kramer
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.990

4.  Multidrug resistant yeasts in synanthropic wild birds.

Authors:  Alexander Tiong Kah Lord; Kavitha Mohandas; Sushela Somanath; Stephen Ambu
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Risk factors for human infection with West Nile Virus in Connecticut: a multi-year analysis.

Authors:  Ann Liu; Vivian Lee; Deron Galusha; Martin D Slade; Maria Diuk-Wasser; Theodore Andreadis; Matthew Scotch; Peter M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.918

6.  The effects of West Nile virus on the reproductive success and overwinter survival of eastern bluebirds in Alabama.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; Lynn Siefferman; Mark Liu; Hassan Hassan; Thomas R Unnasch
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  A framework for evaluating animals as sentinels for infectious disease surveillance.

Authors:  Jo E B Halliday; Anna L Meredith; Darryn L Knobel; Darren J Shaw; Barend M de C Bronsvoort; Sarah Cleaveland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  How long do the dead survive on the road? Carcass persistence probability and implications for road-kill monitoring surveys.

Authors:  Sara M Santos; Filipe Carvalho; António Mira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Crow deaths caused by West Nile virus during winter.

Authors:  Jennifer R Dawson; Ward B Stone; Gregory D Ebel; David S Young; David S Galinski; Jason P Pensabene; Mary A Franke; Millicent Eidson; Laura D Kramer
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Comparison of enzootic risk measures for predicting West Nile disease, Los Angeles, California, USA, 2004-2010.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kwan; Bborie K Park; Tim E Carpenter; Van Ngo; Rachel Civen; William K Reisen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.