BACKGROUND: Persons exposed to residential traffic have increased rates of respiratory morbidity and mortality. As poverty is an important determinant of ill health, some have argued that these associations may relate to the lower socioeconomic status of those living along major roads. AIMS: The objective was to evaluate the association between traffic intensity at home and hospital admissions for respiratory disease among Montreal residents of 60 years and older. METHODS: Case hospitalisations were those with respiratory diagnoses and control hospitalisations were those where the primary discharge diagnosis was non-respiratory. Morning peak traffic estimates from the EMME/2 Montreal traffic model (MOTREM98) were used as an indicator of exposure to road traffic outside the homes of those hospitalised. The crude association between traffic intensity and hospitalisation for respiratory disease was adjusted by an area based estimate of the appraised value of patients' residences, expressed as a dollar average over a small segment of road (lodging value). This indicator of socioeconomic status, as calculated from the Montreal property assessment database, is available at a finer geographical scale than the neighbourhood socioeconomic indicators accessible from the Canadian census. RESULTS: Increased odds of being hospitalised for a respiratory compared with a control diagnosis were associated with higher levels of estimated road traffic nearby patients' homes, even after adjustment for lodging value (crude OR 1.35, CI95% 1.22 to 1.49; adjusted OR 1.18, CI95% 1.06 to 1.31 for >3160 vehicles passing during the three hour morning traffic peak compared with secondary roads off network). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that road traffic intensity itself, may affect the respiratory health of elderly residents of a large Canadian city, an association that is not solely a reflection of socioeconomic status.
BACKGROUND:Persons exposed to residential traffic have increased rates of respiratory morbidity and mortality. As poverty is an important determinant of ill health, some have argued that these associations may relate to the lower socioeconomic status of those living along major roads. AIMS: The objective was to evaluate the association between traffic intensity at home and hospital admissions for respiratory disease among Montreal residents of 60 years and older. METHODS: Case hospitalisations were those with respiratory diagnoses and control hospitalisations were those where the primary discharge diagnosis was non-respiratory. Morning peak traffic estimates from the EMME/2 Montreal traffic model (MOTREM98) were used as an indicator of exposure to road traffic outside the homes of those hospitalised. The crude association between traffic intensity and hospitalisation for respiratory disease was adjusted by an area based estimate of the appraised value of patients' residences, expressed as a dollar average over a small segment of road (lodging value). This indicator of socioeconomic status, as calculated from the Montreal property assessment database, is available at a finer geographical scale than the neighbourhood socioeconomic indicators accessible from the Canadian census. RESULTS: Increased odds of being hospitalised for a respiratory compared with a control diagnosis were associated with higher levels of estimated road traffic nearby patients' homes, even after adjustment for lodging value (crude OR 1.35, CI95% 1.22 to 1.49; adjusted OR 1.18, CI95% 1.06 to 1.31 for >3160 vehicles passing during the three hour morning traffic peak compared with secondary roads off network). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that road traffic intensity itself, may affect the respiratory health of elderly residents of a large Canadian city, an association that is not solely a reflection of socioeconomic status.
Authors: Audrey Smargiassi; Mary Baldwin; Charles Pilger; Rose Dugandzic; Michael Brauer Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: David L Buckeridge; Richard Glazier; Bart J Harvey; Michael Escobar; Carl Amrhein; John Frank Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: S Lin; J P Munsie; M Herdt-Losavio; S A Hwang; K Civerolo; K McGarry; T Gentile Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Thomas Matukala Nkosi; Marie-Elise Parent; Jack Siemiatycki; Javier Pintos; Marie-Claude Rousseau Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Diane Bélanger; Belkacem Abdous; Pierre Valois; Pierre Gosselin; Elhadji A Laouan Sidi Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: A Smargiassi; M S Goldberg; C Plante; M Fournier; Y Baudouin; T Kosatsky Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 3.710