Literature DB >> 16696668

Interactions between Brettanomyces bruxellensis and other yeast species during the initial stages of winemaking.

V Renouf1, M Falcou, C Miot-Sertier, M C Perello, G De Revel, A Lonvaud-Funel.   

Abstract

AIMS: Wine is the product of complex interactions between yeasts and bacteria in grape must. Amongst yeast populations, two groups can be distinguished. The first, named non-Saccharomyces (NS), colonizes, with many other micro-organisms, the surface of grape berries. In the past, NS yeasts were primarily considered as spoilage micro-organisms. However, recent studies have established a positive contribution of certain NS yeasts to wine quality. Amongst the group of NS yeasts, Brettanomyces bruxellensis, which is not prevalent on wine grapes, plays an important part in the evolution of wine aroma. Some of their secondary metabolites, namely volatile phenols, are responsible for wine spoilage. The other group contributing to wine aroma, which is also the main agent of alcoholic fermentation (AF), is composed of Saccharomyces species. The fermenting must is a complex microbial ecosystem where numerous yeast strains grow and die according to their adaptation to the medium. Yeast-yeast interactions occur during winemaking right from the onset of AF. The aim of this study was to describe the interactions between B. bruxellensis, other NS and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during laboratory and practical scale winemaking. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Molecular methods such as internal transcribed spacer-restriction fragment length polymorphism and polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis were used in laboratory scale experiments and cellar observations. The influence of different oenological practices, like the level of sulphiting at harvest time, cold maceration preceding AF, addition of commercial active dry yeasts on B. bruxellensis and other yeast interactions and their evolution during the initial stages of winemaking have been studied. Brettanomyces bruxellensis was the most adapted NS yeast at the beginning of AF, and towards the end of AF it appeared to be more resistant than S. cerevisiae to the conditions of increased alcohol and sugar limitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Among all NS yeast species, B. bruxellensis is better adapted than other wild yeasts to resist in must and during AF. Moreover, B. bruxellensis appeared to be more tolerant to ethanol stress than S. cerevisiae and after AF B. bruxellensis was the main yeast species in wine. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Brettanomyces bruxellensis interacts with other yeast species and adapts to the wine medium as the dominant yeast species at the end of AF. Contamination of B. bruxellensis might take place at the beginning of malolactic fermentation, which is a critical stage in winemaking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16696668     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02959.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  10 in total

1.  Genome survey sequencing of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera (Brettanomyces) bruxellensis.

Authors:  Megan Woolfit; Elzbieta Rozpedowska; Jure Piskur; Kenneth H Wolfe
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2007-02-02

Review 2.  Cellulolytic thermophilic microorganisms in white biotechnology: a review.

Authors:  Kalpana Sahoo; Rajesh Kumar Sahoo; Mahendra Gaur; Enketeswara Subudhi
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Interactions between Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in wine fermentation: influence of inoculation and nitrogen content.

Authors:  Patricia Taillandier; Quoc Phong Lai; Anne Julien-Ortiz; Cédric Brandam
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Brettanomyces bruxellensis yeasts: impact on wine and winemaking.

Authors:  Monica Agnolucci; Antonio Tirelli; Luca Cocolin; Annita Toffanin
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Dekkera bruxellensis and Lactobacillus vini form a stable ethanol-producing consortium in a commercial alcohol production process.

Authors:  Volkmar Passoth; Johanna Blomqvist; Johan Schnürer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Parallel evolution of the make-accumulate-consume strategy in Saccharomyces and Dekkera yeasts.

Authors:  Elzbieta Rozpędowska; Linda Hellborg; Olena P Ishchuk; Furkan Orhan; Silvia Galafassi; Annamaria Merico; Megan Woolfit; Concetta Compagno; Jure Piskur
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Phenotypic landscape of non-conventional yeast species for different stress tolerance traits desirable in bioethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Vaskar Mukherjee; Dorota Radecka; Guido Aerts; Kevin J Verstrepen; Bart Lievens; Johan M Thevelein
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Brettanomyces bruxellensis wine isolates show high geographical dispersal and long persistence in cellars.

Authors:  Alice Cibrario; Marta Avramova; Maria Dimopoulou; Maura Magani; Cécile Miot-Sertier; Albert Mas; Maria C Portillo; Patricia Ballestra; Warren Albertin; Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede; Marguerite Dols-Lafargue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Next-generation sequencing reveals significant bacterial diversity of botrytized wine.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; C M Lucy Joseph; Greg Allen; Andrew K Benson; David A Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The wine and beer yeast Dekkera bruxellensis.

Authors:  Anna Judith Schifferdecker; Sofia Dashko; Olena P Ishchuk; Jure Piškur
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.239

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.