Literature DB >> 16696471

Constrained segment shapes in direct-aperture optimization for step-and-shoot IMRT.

James L Bedford1, Steve Webb.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that, by optimizing segment shapes and weights directly, without explicitly optimizing fluence profiles, effective IMRT plans can be generated with fewer segments. This study proposes a method of direct-aperture optimization with aperture shape constraints, which is designed to provide segmental IMRT plans using a minimum of simple, regular segments. The method uses a cubic function to create smoothly curving multileaf collimator shapes. Constraints on segment dimension and equivalent square are applied, and each segment can be constrained to lie within the previous one, for easy generation of fluence profiles with a single maximum. To simply optimize the segment shapes and reject any shapes which violate the constraints is too inefficient, so an innovative method of feedback optimization is used to ensure in advance that viable aperture shapes are generated. The algorithm is demonstrated using a simple cylindrical phantom consisting of a hemi-annular planning target volume and a central cylindrical organ-at-risk. A simple IMRT rectum case is presented, where segments are used to replace a wedge. More complex cases of prostate and seminal vesicles and prostate and pelvic nodes are also shown. The algorithm produces effective plans in each case with three to five segments per beam. For the simple plans, the constraint that each segment should be contained within the previous one adds additional simplicity to the plan, for a small reduction in plan quality. This study confirms that direct-aperture optimization gives efficient solutions to the segmental IMRT inverse problem and provides a method for generating simple apertures. By using such a method, the workload of IMRT verification may be reduced and simplified, as verification of fluence profiles from individual beams may be eliminated.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16696471     DOI: 10.1118/1.2163832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Adaptive diffusion smoothing: a diffusion-based method to reduce IMRT field complexity.

Authors:  Martha M Matuszak; Edward W Larsen; Kyung-Wook Jee; Daniel L McShan; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Four-dimensional inverse treatment planning with inclusion of implanted fiducials in IMRT segmented fields.

Authors:  Yunzhi Ma; Louis Lee; O Keshet; Paul Keall; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Incorporating deliverable monitor unit constraints into spot intensity optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Gino Lim; Xiaoqiang Li; Yupeng Li; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Using deep learning to predict beam-tunable Pareto optimal dose distribution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gyanendra Bohara; Azar Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie; Steve Jiang; Dan Nguyen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for distal oesophageal malignancies.

Authors:  M A Hawkins; J L Bedford; A P Warrington; D M Tait
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Use of plan quality degradation to evaluate tradeoffs in delivery efficiency and clinical plan metrics arising from IMRT optimizer and sequencer compromises.

Authors:  Joel R Wilkie; Martha M Matuszak; Mary Feng; Jean M Moran; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A two-stage sequential linear programming approach to IMRT dose optimization.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Robert R Meyer; Jianzhou Wu; Shahid A Naqvi; Leyuan Shi; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A feedback constraint optimization method for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yongwu Li; Xiaonan Sun; Q I Wang; Qinxuan Zhou; Benxing Gu; Guozhi Shi; Dongliang Jiang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Relationship of segment area and monitor unit efficiency in aperture-based IMRT optimization.

Authors:  Peng Qi; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Direct machine parameter optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of oropharyngeal cancer--a planning study.

Authors:  Barbara Dobler; Oliver Koelbl; Ludwig Bogner; Fabian Pohl
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.