Literature DB >> 16691271

[When should the trauma team be activated?].

Andreas J Krüger1, Nina Hesselberg, Geir Tore Abrahamsen, Kristian Bartnes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On admission to hospital, severely injured patients should be received by a trauma team so that the prospects of early life-saving treatment are not precluded. Considerations about use of resources indicate that the team is not activated when the likelihood of serious injury is low. A recommendation with criteria for activation of the trauma team has been established at the University Hospital of North Norway. We have studied how the recommendations were followed and calculated over- and under-triage and to highlight the question of whether activation should rather be automatically implemented based on predefined criteria.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We use descriptive statistics to analyse compliance with the recommendation as well as pre- and intra-hospital data for trauma patients who prior to admission were recognised as having fulfilled the criteria.
RESULTS: Of the 109 trauma victims who, according to the recommendation, from 1 June 2001 to 31 May 2002 should have been received by the trauma team, 59 were received by a surgeon alone. Given that all patients with an injury severity score of 16 or more should be received by a trauma team, under-utilisation of the team was 50%, whereas the proportion of excess calls was 58%. Elimination of under-utilisation among this group of patients would, by strict adherence to the criteria, have conferred a very modest increase in the proportion of superfluous calls to 61%.
INTERPRETATION: The trauma team should be activated automatically in accordance with predefined criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16691271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen        ISSN: 0029-2001


  7 in total

1.  A quality-improvement approach to effective trauma team activation

Authors:  Kevin Verhoeff; Rachelle Saybel; Vanessa Fawcett; Bonnie Tsang; Pamela Mathura; Sandy Widder
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Differences in trauma team activation criteria among Norwegian hospitals.

Authors:  Kristin T Larsen; Oddvar Uleberg; Eirik Skogvoll
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Video conferencing versus telephone calls for team work across hospitals: a qualitative study on simulated emergencies.

Authors:  Stein R Bolle; Frank Larsen; Oddvar Hagen; Mads Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11-30

4.  Evaluation of a university hospital trauma team activation protocol.

Authors:  Trond Dehli; Knut Fredriksen; Svein A Osbakk; Kristian Bartnes
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Patients Referred to a Norwegian Trauma Centre: effect of transfer distance on injury patterns, use of resources and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Kristiansen; Hans M Lossius; Kjetil Søreide; Petter A Steen; Christine Gaarder; Pål A Næss
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2011-06-16

6.  Precision of field triage in patients brought to a trauma centre after introducing trauma team activation guidelines.

Authors:  Marius Rehn; Torsten Eken; Andreas Jorstad Krüger; Petter Andreas Steen; Nils Oddvar Skaga; Hans Morten Lossius
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Evaluation of a trauma team activation protocol revision: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Trond Dehli; Svein Arne Monsen; Knut Fredriksen; Kristian Bartnes
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.953

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.