Stein R Bolle1, Frank Larsen, Oddvar Hagen, Mads Gilbert. 1. University Hospital of North Norway, Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, 9038 Tromsø, Norway. stein.roald.bolle@telemed.no
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Teamwork is important for patient care and outcome in emergencies. In rural areas, efficient communication between rural hospitals and regional trauma centers optimise decisions and treatment of trauma patients. Little is known on potentials and effects of virtual team to team cooperation between rural and regional trauma teams. METHODS: We adapted a video conferencing (VC) system to the work process between multidisciplinary teams responsible for trauma as well as medical emergencies between one rural and one regional (university) hospital. We studied how the teams cooperated during simulated critical scenarios, and compared VC with standard telephone communication. We used qualitative observations and interviews to evaluate results. RESULTS: The team members found VC to be a useful tool during emergencies and for building "virtual emergency teams" across distant hospitals. Visual communication combined with visual patient information is superior to information gained during ordinary telephone calls, but VC may also cause interruptions in the local teamwork. CONCLUSION: VC can improve clinical cooperation and decision processes in virtual teams during critical patient care. Such team interaction requires thoughtful organisation, training, and new rules for communication.
BACKGROUND: Teamwork is important for patient care and outcome in emergencies. In rural areas, efficient communication between rural hospitals and regional trauma centers optimise decisions and treatment of traumapatients. Little is known on potentials and effects of virtual team to team cooperation between rural and regional trauma teams. METHODS: We adapted a video conferencing (VC) system to the work process between multidisciplinary teams responsible for trauma as well as medical emergencies between one rural and one regional (university) hospital. We studied how the teams cooperated during simulated critical scenarios, and compared VC with standard telephone communication. We used qualitative observations and interviews to evaluate results. RESULTS: The team members found VC to be a useful tool during emergencies and for building "virtual emergency teams" across distant hospitals. Visual communication combined with visual patient information is superior to information gained during ordinary telephone calls, but VC may also cause interruptions in the local teamwork. CONCLUSION: VC can improve clinical cooperation and decision processes in virtual teams during critical patient care. Such team interaction requires thoughtful organisation, training, and new rules for communication.
Authors: Marian P LaMonte; Mona N Bahouth; Peter Hu; Mohammed Y Pathan; Karen L Yarbrough; Ruwani Gunawardane; Patrick Crarey; Wesley Page Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-01-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michael A Ricci; Michael Caputo; Judith Amour; Frederick B Rogers; Kenneth Sartorelli; Peter W Callas; Patrick T Malone Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2003 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Johanna I Westbrook; Enrico W Coiera; Michelle Brear; Stuart Stapleton; Marilyn I Rob; Monique Murphy; Patrick Cregan Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Patricia Breen; Kevin Murphy; Geraldine Browne; Fiona Molloy; Valerie Reid; Colin Doherty; Norman Delanty; Sean Connolly; Mary Fitzsimons Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Christina Tsou; Suzanne Robinson; James Boyd; Andrew Jamieson; Robert Blakeman; Justin Yeung; Josephine McDonnell; Stephanie Waters; Kylie Bosich; Delia Hendrie Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 5.428