Literature DB >> 16689949

Validation of a randomization procedure to assess animal habitat preferences: microhabitat use of tiger sharks in a seagrass ecosystem.

Michael R Heithaus1, Ian M Hamilton, Aaron J Wirsing, Lawrence M Dill.   

Abstract

1. Tiger sharks Galeocerdo cuvier are important predators in a variety of nearshore communities, including the seagrass ecosystem of Shark Bay, Western Australia. Because tiger sharks are known to influence spatial distributions of multiple prey species, it is important to understand how they use habitats at a variety of spatial scales. We used a combination of catch rates and acoustic tracking to determine tiger shark microhabitat use in Shark Bay. 2. Comparing habitat-use data from tracking against the null hypothesis of no habitat preference is hindered in Shark Bay, as elsewhere, by the difficulty of defining expected habitat use given random movement. We used randomization procedures to generate expected habitat use in the absence of habitat preference and expected habitat use differences among groups (e.g. males and females). We tested the performance of these protocols using simulated data sets with known habitat preferences. 3. The technique correctly classified sets of simulated tracks as displaying a preference or not and was a conservative test for differences in habitat preferences between subgroups of tracks (e.g. males vs. females). 4. Sharks preferred shallow habitats over deep ones, and preferred shallow edge microhabitats over shallow interior ones. The use of shallow edges likely increases encounter rates with potential prey and may have profound consequences for the dynamics of Shark Bay's seagrass ecosystem through indirect effects transmitted by grazers that are common prey of tiger sharks. 5. Females showed a greater tendency to use shallow edge microhabitats than did males; this pattern was not detected by traditional analysis techniques. 6. The randomization procedures presented here are applicable to many field studies that use tracking by allowing researchers both to determine overall habitat preferences and to identify differences in habitat use between groups within their sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16689949     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01087.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  Habitat requirements of weasels Mustela nivalis constrain their impact on prey populations in complex ecosystems of the temperate zone.

Authors:  K Zub; L Sönnichsen; P A Szafrańska
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Estimating adult sex ratios in nature.

Authors:  Sergio Ancona; Francisco V Dénes; Oliver Krüger; Tamás Székely; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators.

Authors:  Charles W Martin; F Joel Fodrie; Kenneth L Heck; Johanna Mattila
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Can measures of prey availability improve our ability to predict the abundance of large marine predators?

Authors:  Aaron J Wirsing; Michael R Heithaus; Lawrence M Dill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Isolation and characterization of eight microsatellite loci from Galeocerdo cuvier (tiger shark) and cross-amplification in Carcharhinus leucas, Carcharhinus brevipinna, Carcharhinus plumbeus and Sphyrna lewini.

Authors:  Agathe Pirog; Sébastien Jaquemet; Antonin Blaison; Marc Soria; Hélène Magalon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Reef-fidelity and migration of tiger sharks, Galeocerdo cuvier, across the Coral Sea.

Authors:  Jonathan M Werry; Serge Planes; Michael L Berumen; Kate A Lee; Camrin D Braun; Eric Clua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in Movement Pattern and Detectability between Males and Females Influence How Common Sampling Methods Estimate Sex Ratio.

Authors:  João Fabrício Mota Rodrigues; Marco Túlio Pacheco Coelho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.