Literature DB >> 16689800

The effect of promoter strength, supercoiling and secondary structure on mutation rates in Escherichia coli.

Karen H Schmidt1, Jacqueline M Reimers, Barbara E Wright.   

Abstract

Four mutations resulting in opal stop codons were individually engineered into a plasmid-borne chloramphenicol-resistance (cat) gene driven by the lac promoter. These four mutations were located at different sites in secondary structures. The mutations were analysed with the computer program mfg, which predicted their relative reversion frequencies. Reversion frequencies determined experimentally correlated with the mutability of the bases as predicted by mfg. To examine the effect of increased transcription on reversion frequencies, the lac promoter was replaced with the stronger tac promoter, which resulted in 12- to 30-fold increases in reversion rates. The effect of increased and decreased supercoiling was also investigated. The cat mutants had higher reversion rates in a topA mutant strain with increased negative supercoiling compared with wild-type levels, and the cat reversion rates were lower in a topA gyrB mutant strain with decreased negative supercoiling, as predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16689800     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05166.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  14 in total

1.  I. VH gene transcription creates stabilized secondary structures for coordinated mutagenesis during somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Barbara E Wright; Karen H Schmidt; Michael F Minnick; Nick Davis
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  RNA polymerase II contributes to preventing transcription-mediated replication fork stalls.

Authors:  Irene Felipe-Abrio; Juan Lafuente-Barquero; María L García-Rubio; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Evolution of coordinated mutagenesis and somatic hypermutation in VH5.

Authors:  Barbara E Wright; Karen H Schmidt; Aaron T Hunt; Dennis K Reschke; Michael F Minnick
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.407

4.  Stabilised DNA secondary structures with increasing transcription localise hypermutable bases for somatic hypermutation in IGHV3-23.

Authors:  Bhargavi Duvvuri; Venkata R Duvvuri; Jianhong Wu; Gillian E Wu
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  The roles of transcription and genotoxins underlying p53 mutagenesis in vivo.

Authors:  Barbara E Wright; Karen H Schmidt; Aaron T Hunt; J Stephen Lodmell; Michael F Minnick; Dennis K Reschke
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Why genes evolve faster on secondary chromosomes in bacteria.

Authors:  Vaughn S Cooper; Samuel H Vohr; Sarah C Wrocklage; Philip J Hatcher
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  Transcription as a source of genome instability.

Authors:  Nayun Kim; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Transcription increases methylmethane sulfonate-induced mutations in alkB strains of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Douglas Fix; Chandrika Canugovi; Ashok S Bhagwat
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-02

9.  Non-B DNA-Forming Motifs Promote Mfd-Dependent Stationary-Phase Mutagenesis in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Tatiana Ermi; Carmen Vallin; Ana Gabriela Regalado García; Moises Bravo; Ismaray Fernandez Cordero; Holly Anne Martin; Mario Pedraza-Reyes; Eduardo Robleto
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-12

10.  R-loop mediated transcription-associated recombination in trf4Δ mutants reveals new links between RNA surveillance and genome integrity.

Authors:  Sandra Gavaldá; Mercedes Gallardo; Rosa Luna; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.