Literature DB >> 16687018

A case-controlled matched-pair cohort study of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and Lap-Band patients in a single US center with three-year follow-up.

Daniel R Cottam1, James Atkinson, Aaron Anderson, Brian Grace, Barry Fisher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the most common operation for treatment of morbid obesity in USA. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) has been the most common bariatric operation performed worldwide. The LapBand was approved for use in USA in July 2001. Since then, several US surgeons have adopted one procedure preferentially over the other, and several have reported patient outcomes. We added the option of the LAGB to the RYGBP in our practice in July 2001. We hypothesized that both procedures will provide similar weight loss and co-morbidity reduction if followed for a sufficient length of time. To enhance weight loss, we adopted a patient behavioral program that is easy to remember, in an attempt to ensure a reduction in caloric intake and reduce hunger regardless of the operation performed.
METHODS: A case-controlled matched-pair cohort study was conducted. All patients who presented to the Surgical Weight Control Center of Las Vegas between Aug 2001 and Aug 2004 for LAGB were placed into one group, and a matched-pair RYGBP cohort group was created. Patients in the RYGBP cohort were matched for age, sex, date of surgery, and BMI. All patients were evaluated on an intention to treat basis. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. All patients were subjected to the same preoperative education regarding calorie reduction behaviors and diet change, and received the same postoperative counseling regarding long-term eating behavior and food choices.
RESULTS: During this period, 208 patients underwent LAGB and 600 underwent RYGBP. Of the 208 LAGB patients, 181 had suitable open or laparoscopic RYGBP matches. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, BMI, and co-morbidities. There were no deaths in either group. Resolution of co-morbidities statistically favored RYGBP as did the weight loss, over the study period.
CONCLUSION: When patients are matched with 3-year follow-up according to time of surgery, age, sex and BMI, LRYGBP provides superior weight and co-morbidity reduction and can be done without severe complications. However, the LAGB is an effective weight loss tool and not every patient wishes to have the LRYGBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16687018     DOI: 10.1381/096089206776944913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  31 in total

1.  Improved heart rate recovery after marked weight loss induced by gastric bypass surgery: two-year follow up in the Utah Obesity Study.

Authors:  Stephen L Wasmund; Theophilus Owan; Frank G Yanowitz; Ted D Adams; Steven C Hunt; Mohamed H Hamdan; Sheldon E Litwin
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up.

Authors:  Austin Cottam; Daniel Cottam; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards; Samuel Cottam; Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Gut hormones as potential new targets for appetite regulation and the treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Benjamin C T Field; Alison M Wren; Dunstan Cooke; Stephen R Bloom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Blunting of adaptive thermogenesis as a potential additional mechanism to promote weight loss after gastric bypass.

Authors:  Matthew G Browning; Charlotte Rabl; Guilherme M Campos
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 5.  Obesity treatment: novel peripheral targets.

Authors:  Benjamin C T Field; Owais B Chaudhri; Stephen R Bloom
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Prospective evaluation and 7-year follow-up of Swedish adjustable gastric banding in adults with extreme obesity.

Authors:  Bruno M Balsiger; Daniel Ernst; Daniel Giachino; Ruedi Bachmann; Andreas Glaettli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Comparison of those who succeed in losing significant excessive weight after bariatric surgery and those who fail.

Authors:  Brad Snyder; Alex Nguyen; Terry Scarbourough; Sherman Yu; Erik Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Long-term results of bariatric restrictive procedures: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ruben Schouten; Dorothee C Wiryasaputra; Francois M H van Dielen; Wim G van Gemert; Jan Willem M Greve
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  The surgical treatment of type II diabetes mellitus: changes in HOMA Insulin resistance in the first year following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).

Authors:  Garth H Ballantyne; Annette Wasielewski; John K Saunders
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.