Allison B Rosen1. 1. Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. abrosen@umich.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) improve cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk individuals with diabetes. Despite the marked benefit, it is unknown what percentage of patients with diabetes would benefit from and what percentage actually receive this preventive therapy. OBJECTIVES: To examine the proportion of older diabetic patients with indications for ACE or ARB (ACE/ARB). To generate national estimates of ACE/ARB use. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey of 742 individuals> or =55 years (representing 8.02 million U.S. adults) self-reporting diabetes in the 1999 to 2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence of guideline indications (albuminuria, cardiovascular disease, hypertension) and other cardiac risk factors (hyperlipidemia, smoking) with potential benefit from ACE/ARB. Prevalence of ACE/ARB use overall and by clinical indication. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent had guideline indications for ACE/ARB. Including additional cardiac risk factors, the entire (100%) U.S. noninstitutionalized older population with diabetes had indications for ACE/ARB. Overall, 43% of the population received ACE/ARB. Hypertension was associated with higher rates of ACE/ARB use, while albuminuria and cardiovascular disease were not. As the number of indications increased, rates of use increased, however, the maximum prevalence of use was only 53% in individuals with 4 or more indications for ACE/ARB. CONCLUSIONS: ACE/ARB is indicated in virtually all older individuals with diabetes; yet, national rates of use are disturbingly low and key risk factors (albuminuria and cardiovascular disease) are being missed. To improve quality of diabetes care nationally, use of ACE/ARB therapy by ALL older diabetics may be a desirable addition to diabetes performance measurement sets.
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) improve cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk individuals with diabetes. Despite the marked benefit, it is unknown what percentage of patients with diabetes would benefit from and what percentage actually receive this preventive therapy. OBJECTIVES: To examine the proportion of older diabeticpatients with indications for ACE or ARB (ACE/ARB). To generate national estimates of ACE/ARB use. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey of 742 individuals> or =55 years (representing 8.02 million U.S. adults) self-reporting diabetes in the 1999 to 2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence of guideline indications (albuminuria, cardiovascular disease, hypertension) and other cardiac risk factors (hyperlipidemia, smoking) with potential benefit from ACE/ARB. Prevalence of ACE/ARB use overall and by clinical indication. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent had guideline indications for ACE/ARB. Including additional cardiac risk factors, the entire (100%) U.S. noninstitutionalized older population with diabetes had indications for ACE/ARB. Overall, 43% of the population received ACE/ARB. Hypertension was associated with higher rates of ACE/ARB use, while albuminuria and cardiovascular disease were not. As the number of indications increased, rates of use increased, however, the maximum prevalence of use was only 53% in individuals with 4 or more indications for ACE/ARB. CONCLUSIONS:ACE/ARB is indicated in virtually all older individuals with diabetes; yet, national rates of use are disturbingly low and key risk factors (albuminuria and cardiovascular disease) are being missed. To improve quality of diabetes care nationally, use of ACE/ARB therapy by ALL older diabetics may be a desirable addition to diabetes performance measurement sets.
Authors: P H Bennett; S Haffner; B L Kasiske; W F Keane; C E Mogensen; H H Parving; M W Steffes; G E Striker Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Samina T Syed; Lisa K Sharp; Yoonsang Kim; Adam Jentleson; Claudia M Lora; Daniel R Touchette; Michael L Berbaum; Katie J Suda; Ben S Gerber Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Claudia M Lora; Alexander W Sokolovsky; Daniel R Touchette; Jing Jin; Xiaojing Hu; Weihua Gao; Ben S Gerber Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Yi Yang; Vennela Thumula; Patrick F Pace; Benjamin F Banahan; Noel E Wilkin; William B Lobb Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Paul Laflam; Kristen E Schmitt; Christine F Edie; Loretta A Simbartl; Charuhas V Thakar Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Beatriz Navarro-Vidal; José R Banegas; Luz M León-Muñoz; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; Auxiliadora Graciani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 3.240