Literature DB >> 16686442

[Possibilities and limitations of statistical regression models for the calculation of threshold values for minimum provider volumes].

Ralf Bender1, Ulrich Grouven.   

Abstract

Inadequate statistical procedures are often applied for the derivation of threshold values in various medical research areas. The frequently applied method to establish threshold values on the basis of simple comparisons between arbitrarily defined low-volume and high-volume groups may be misleading because the result depends on the preceding classification. In this paper, the possibilities and limitations of statistical regression models for the calculation of threshold values are described. The features of these models for the selection of minimum volumes for hospitals or physicians are discussed. Simulated data examples are used to demonstrate that the definition of a useful minimum provider volume should not be based upon a calculated value of purely mathematical meaning without clinically assessing the risk curve. In the application of statistical regression models to retrospective observational data it should be noticed that calculated threshold values are only of a hypothesis-generating character. In order to verify that a minimum provider volume leads to the expected quality improvement, a prospective intervention study is required.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16686442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich        ISSN: 1431-7621


  8 in total

1.  [Is it possible to calculate minimum provider volumes for total knee replacement using routine data? Results of a threshold value analysis of German quality assurance data for inpatient treatment].

Authors:  P Schräder; U Grouven; R Bender
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Volume theory--volume void?!].

Authors:  Jürgen Graf; Uwe Janssens
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  [Minimum provider volumes in heart surgery].

Authors:  H J Geissler; F Beyersdorf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Effects of minimum volume regulations. Orthopedic and trauma-specific implications].

Authors:  D Stengel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  The effect of specialized cancer treatment centers on treatment efficacy in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Beate Klimm; Corinne Brillant; Nicole Skoetz; Horst Müller; Andreas Engert; Peter Borchmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Achieving minimum caseload requirements: an analysis of hospital quality control reports from 2004-2010.

Authors:  Werner de Cruppé; Marc Malik; Max Geraedts
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Defining minimum volume thresholds to increase quality of care: a new patient-oriented approach using mixed integer programming.

Authors:  Justus F A Vogel; Max Barkhausen; Christoph M Pross; Alexander Geissler
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-01-28

8.  Evaluating compulsory minimum volume standards in Germany: how many hospitals were compliant in 2004?

Authors:  Werner de Cruppé; Christian Ohmann; Karl Blum; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.