Literature DB >> 17928976

[Minimum provider volumes in heart surgery].

H J Geissler1, F Beyersdorf.   

Abstract

The introduction of minimum provider volumes for certain medical procedures has been the subject of scientific investigation and political controversy for quite a while. The core of the discussion focuses on the hypothesis that minimum provider volumes could significantly improve operative results and cost efficiency. In Germany the Fifth Volume of Social Law (Sozialgesetzbuch V) set the legal stage for the implementation of minimum provider volumes. This article is a brief review on the experience with minimum provider volumes in cardiac surgery. The main focus is on coronary artery bypass surgery, as this happens to be the most frequently investigated procedure.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17928976     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1413-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  20 in total

1.  Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths.

Authors:  R A Dudley; K L Johansen; R Brand; D J Rennie; A Milstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Hospital volume versus outcome: an unusual example of bivariate association.

Authors:  Rebecca A Betensky; Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Treacy Silverstein; Ann F Lovett; Robert E Wolf; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scheduled vs nonscheduled operations.

Authors:  J A Showstack; K E Rosenfeld; D W Garnick; H S Luft; R W Schaffarzick; J Fowles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Volume requirements for cardiac surgery credentialing: a critical examination. The Ad Hoc Committee on Cardiac Surgery Credentialing of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  F A Crawford; R P Anderson; R E Clark; F L Grover; N T Kouchoukos; J A Waldhausen; B R Wilcox
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Does practice make perfect? Part I: The relation between hospital volume and outcomes for selected diagnostic categories.

Authors:  A B Flood; W R Scott; W Ewy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; Laura P Coombs; Elizabeth R DeLong; Constance K Haan; T Bruce Ferguson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors.

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; H Bernard; J F O'Donnell; G Lukacik; E P Shields
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Saif S Rathore; Harlan M Krumholz; Kevin G M Volpp
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.