Literature DB >> 16684704

A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.

Mathias Hällgren1, Birgitta Larsby, Stig Arlinger.   

Abstract

A Swedish Hearing In Noise Test (HINT), consisting of everyday sentences to be used in an adaptive procedure to estimate the speech recognition thresholds in noise and quiet, has been developed. The material consists of 250 sentences, with a length of five to nine syllables, normalized for naturalness, difficulty and reliability. The sentences were recorded with a female speaker. From the sentences, 25 phonemically balanced lists were created. All lists fluctuate less than 1 dB of the overall mean. The standard deviation of the test-retest difference is 0.94 dB when testing with one list, and decreases to 0.68 dB and 0.56 dB for two and three lists, respectively. The average speech recognition thresholds in noise for the Swedish sentences were -3.0 dB signal/noise ratio (SD=1.1 dB). The present study has resulted in a well-defined and internationally comparable set of sentences, which can be used in Swedish audiological rehabilitation and research to measure speech recognition in noise and quiet.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16684704     DOI: 10.1080/14992020500429583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  33 in total

1.  [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].

Authors:  H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Neural tracking of attended versus ignored speech is differentially affected by hearing loss.

Authors:  Eline Borch Petersen; Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cognitive hearing science: the legacy of Stuart Gatehouse.

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Mary Rudner; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-05-22

Review 4.  How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.

Authors:  Jana Besser; Thomas Koelewijn; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-08-13

5.  Gated audiovisual speech identification in silence vs. noise: effects on time and accuracy.

Authors:  Shahram Moradi; Björn Lidestam; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-19

6.  Hearing performance benefits of a programmable power baha® sound processor with a directional microphone for patients with a mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Mark C Flynn; Annelen Hedin; Glenn Halvarsson; Tobias Good; Andre Sadeghi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Eline B Petersen; Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser; Stefan Stenfelt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

8.  Subjective ratings of masker disturbance during the perception of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Lisa Kilman; Adriana A Zekveld; Mathias Hällgren; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11

9.  How does susceptibility to proactive interference relate to speech recognition in aided and unaided conditions?

Authors:  Rachel J Ellis; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-03

10.  Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome.

Authors:  Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Mary Rudner; Thomas Lunner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Speech Lang Hear       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.