Literature DB >> 16684510

The spatio-temporal brain dynamics of processing and integrating sound localization cues in humans.

Eric Tardif1, Micah M Murray, Raphaël Meylan, Lucas Spierer, Stephanie Clarke.   

Abstract

Interaural intensity and time differences (IID and ITD) are two binaural auditory cues for localizing sounds in space. This study investigated the spatio-temporal brain mechanisms for processing and integrating IID and ITD cues in humans. Auditory-evoked potentials were recorded, while subjects passively listened to noise bursts lateralized with IID, ITD or both cues simultaneously, as well as a more frequent centrally presented noise. In a separate psychophysical experiment, subjects actively discriminated lateralized from centrally presented stimuli. IID and ITD cues elicited different electric field topographies starting at approximately 75 ms post-stimulus onset, indicative of the engagement of distinct cortical networks. By contrast, no performance differences were observed between IID and ITD cues during the psychophysical experiment. Subjects did, however, respond significantly faster and more accurately when both cues were presented simultaneously. This performance facilitation exceeded predictions from probability summation, suggestive of interactions in neural processing of IID and ITD cues. Supra-additive neural response interactions as well as topographic modulations were indeed observed approximately 200 ms post-stimulus for the comparison of responses to the simultaneous presentation of both cues with the mean of those to separate IID and ITD cues. Source estimations revealed differential processing of IID and ITD cues initially within superior temporal cortices and also at later stages within temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortices. Differences were principally in terms of hemispheric lateralization. The collective psychophysical and electrophysiological results support the hypothesis that IID and ITD cues are processed by distinct, but interacting, cortical networks that can in turn facilitate auditory localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16684510     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  17 in total

1.  Cross auditory-spatial learning in early-blind individuals.

Authors:  Chetwyn C H Chan; Alex W K Wong; Kin-Hung Ting; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Jufang He; Tatia M C Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neuronal representations of distance in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Samantha Huang; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Chinmayi Tengshe; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Trading of interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Learning-induced plasticity in auditory spatial representations revealed by electrical neuroimaging.

Authors:  Lucas Spierer; Eric Tardif; Holger Sperdin; Micah M Murray; Stephanie Clarke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A recency effect in sound localization?

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Tuning to Binaural Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Nathan C Higgins; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

9.  Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Susan A McLaughlin; Teemu Rinne; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.