Literature DB >> 16683870

Defining error in anatomic pathology.

Ronald L Sirota1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although much has been said and written about medical error and about error in pathology since the publication of the Institute of Medicine's report on medical error in 1999, precise definitions of what constitutes error in anatomic pathology do not exist for the specialty. Without better definitions, it is impossible to accurately judge errors in pathology. The lack of standardized definitions has implications for patient care and for the legal judgment of malpractice.
OBJECTIVES: To review the goals of anatomic pathology, to discuss the problems inherent in applying these goals to the judgment of error in pathology, to offer definitions of major and minor errors in pathology, and to discuss error in anatomic pathology in relation to the classic laboratory test cycle. DATA SOURCES: Existing literature.
CONCLUSION: Definitions for major and minor error in anatomic pathology are proffered, and anatomic pathology error is characterized in the classic test cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16683870     DOI: 10.5858/2006-130-604-DEIAP

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  7 in total

1.  How trustworthy is a diagnosis in head and neck surgical pathology? A consideration of diagnostic discrepancies (errors).

Authors:  Julia A Woolgar; Alfio Ferlito; Kenneth O Devaney; Alessandra Rinaldo; Leon Barnes
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Validation of a Muscle-Specific Tissue Image Analysis Tool for Quantitative Assessment of Dystrophin Staining in Frozen Muscle Biopsies.

Authors:  Famke Aeffner; Crystal Faelan; Steven A Moore; Alexander Moody; Joshua C Black; Jay S Charleston; Diane E Frank; Johannes Dworzak; J Kris Piper; Manish Ranjitkar; Kristin Wilson; Suzanne Kanaly; Daniel G Rudmann; Holger Lange; G David Young; Anthony J Milici
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Use of a laboratory information system driven tool for pre-signout quality assurance of random cytopathology reports.

Authors:  Sonal Kamat; Anil V Parwani; Walid E Khalbuss; Sara E Monaco; Susan M Kelly; Luke T Wiehagen; Anthony L Piccoli; Karen M Lassige; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-08-27

4.  Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study.

Authors:  P Morelli; E Porazzi; M Ruspini; U Restelli; G Banfi
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2013-06

5.  The cost-saving effect of centralized histological reviews with soft tissue and visceral sarcomas, GIST, and desmoid tumors: The experiences of the pathologists of the French Sarcoma Group.

Authors:  Lionel Perrier; Pauline Rascle; Magali Morelle; Maud Toulmonde; Dominique Ranchere Vince; Axel Le Cesne; Philippe Terrier; Agnès Neuville; Pierre Meeus; Fadila Farsi; Françoise Ducimetière; Jean-Yves Blay; Isabelle Ray Coquard; Jean-Michel Coindre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Computational Algorithms that Effectively Reduce Report Defects in Surgical Pathology.

Authors:  Jay J Ye; Michael R Tan
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2019-07-01

7.  Protecting the patient is our protection.

Authors:  Simonetta Piana; Zoe Apalla
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2014-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.