INTRODUCTION: The follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) is the most common histologic subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). However, it is still controversial whether FVPTC should behave differently from classical PTC (CPTC). The present study aimed at evaluating any potential difference in clinicopathologic features and long-term outcome of FVPTC as compared with CPTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 568 patients with PTC managed from 1973 to 2004, 308 were shown to have CPTC (54.2%) and 67 (11.8%) FVPTC after histologic review. The mean (+/- SD) follow-up period was 11.3 (+/- 8.9) years. The two groups were compared in terms of clinicopathological features, treatment received, and outcome regarding recurrence and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: There was no difference in age and gender ratio between the CPTC and FVPTC patients. Both groups had similar tumor characteristics in terms of tumor size, presence of multifocality, capsular invasion, lymphovascular permeation, and perineural infiltration. However, FVPTC patients had significantly fewer histologically confirmed cervical lymph node metastases (P = 0.027) and extrathyroidal involvement (P = 0.005). The proportion of bilateral resection, adjuvant radioactive iodine, and lymph node dissection did not differ significantly between the two groups. The FVPTC patients had a more favorable tumor risk by DeGroot classification (P = 0.003) and MACIS (Metastasis, Age, Completeness of excision, Invasiveness, and Size) score (P = 0.026). The 10- and 15-year actuarial disease-specific survivals did not differ significantly between FVPTC and CPTC patients (96.2% versus 90.7% and 96.2% versus 89.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with FVPTC had more favorable clinicopathologic features and a better tumor risk group profile, their long-term outcome was similar to that of CPTC patients.
INTRODUCTION: The follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) is the most common histologic subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). However, it is still controversial whether FVPTC should behave differently from classical PTC (CPTC). The present study aimed at evaluating any potential difference in clinicopathologic features and long-term outcome of FVPTC as compared with CPTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 568 patients with PTC managed from 1973 to 2004, 308 were shown to have CPTC (54.2%) and 67 (11.8%) FVPTC after histologic review. The mean (+/- SD) follow-up period was 11.3 (+/- 8.9) years. The two groups were compared in terms of clinicopathological features, treatment received, and outcome regarding recurrence and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: There was no difference in age and gender ratio between the CPTC and FVPTC patients. Both groups had similar tumor characteristics in terms of tumor size, presence of multifocality, capsular invasion, lymphovascular permeation, and perineural infiltration. However, FVPTC patients had significantly fewer histologically confirmed cervical lymph node metastases (P = 0.027) and extrathyroidal involvement (P = 0.005). The proportion of bilateral resection, adjuvant radioactive iodine, and lymph node dissection did not differ significantly between the two groups. The FVPTC patients had a more favorable tumor risk by DeGroot classification (P = 0.003) and MACIS (Metastasis, Age, Completeness of excision, Invasiveness, and Size) score (P = 0.026). The 10- and 15-year actuarial disease-specific survivals did not differ significantly between FVPTC and CPTCpatients (96.2% versus 90.7% and 96.2% versus 89.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with FVPTC had more favorable clinicopathologic features and a better tumor risk group profile, their long-term outcome was similar to that of CPTCpatients.
Authors: Laura Falvo; Antonio Catania; Vito D'Andrea; Antonella Marzullo; Maria Cristina Giustiniani; Enrico De Antoni Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Zhaowen Zhu; Manoj Gandhi; Marina N Nikiforova; Andrew H Fischer; Yuri E Nikiforov Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Christian Passler; Gerhard Prager; Christian Scheuba; Barbara E Niederle; Klaus Kaserer; Georg Zettinig; Bruno Niederle Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2003-12
Authors: Ricardo V Lloyd; Lori A Erickson; Mary B Casey; King Y Lam; Christine M Lohse; Sylvia L Asa; John K C Chan; Ronald A DeLellis; H Ruben Harach; Kennichi Kakudo; Virginia A LiVolsi; Juan Rosai; Thomas J Sebo; Manuel Sobrinho-Simoes; Bruce M Wenig; Marick E Lae Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Jarosław Jendrzejewski; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Andrew Eiterman; Andrew Thomas; Huiling He; Rebecca Nagy; Leigha Senter; Krzysztof Sworczak; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 7.396